2018
DOI: 10.2196/preprints.10200
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Symptom Change Following Web-Based Psychotherapy: Statistical Characteristics and Analytical Methods for Measuring and Interpreting Change (Preprint)

Abstract: Highlights In this paper we explore the statistical characteristics of depressive symptom change (PHQ9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001) associated with a large web-based psychotherapy sample (ICBT; n=1096), and compare between two common ways to measure and interpret symptom change (linear and proportional change). Results demonstrated that within both treatment and waitlist conditions, symptoms changed proportionally to baseline (e.g. 50-55% treatment related change across individuals from different bas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is an increasing evidence of methodological issues related to the use of the RCI as a method of detecting clinically significant change (see Karin, 2019; McAleavey, 2022). Therefore, we also report the proportion of individuals who achieved a minimally significant improvement (≥25% reduction; Karin, 2019) or clinically significant improvement (≥50% reduction) in symptoms at each timepoint relative to their symptoms at assessment. The percentage change approach avoids the methodological issues associated with the RCI while providing tangible, clinically relevant benchmarks for symptom improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is an increasing evidence of methodological issues related to the use of the RCI as a method of detecting clinically significant change (see Karin, 2019; McAleavey, 2022). Therefore, we also report the proportion of individuals who achieved a minimally significant improvement (≥25% reduction; Karin, 2019) or clinically significant improvement (≥50% reduction) in symptoms at each timepoint relative to their symptoms at assessment. The percentage change approach avoids the methodological issues associated with the RCI while providing tangible, clinically relevant benchmarks for symptom improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%