“…It should be noticed, however, that for the ground states of to6, tos, 110Ag ' where the spin I= 1 is due to the same nucleon configuration as in the metastable states, the agreement between the calculated moment (#f,cal~=3.15#,) and the measured moments (#~= 2.8 p, [12][13][14]) is less satisfactory. As pointed out by Noya, Arima, and Horie [15] configuration interaction may not be taken completely into account by using the empirical g-values; recently Callaghan [16] showed that there is an additional term arising from the coupling of the rotational motion of the core to the individual particle motion, which may differ in adjacent nuclei.…”