1988
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(88)91872-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the ratios of deep inelastic muon-nucleus cross sections on various nuclei compared to deuterium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SLAC measured the ratio of carbon to deuterium in their comprehensive study in 1994 [15] and the EMC collaboration measured the ratio in the followup to their original measurement on Iron [14]. We therefore present our result on carbon first.…”
Section: Cross Section Ratio For Carbonmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SLAC measured the ratio of carbon to deuterium in their comprehensive study in 1994 [15] and the EMC collaboration measured the ratio in the followup to their original measurement on Iron [14]. We therefore present our result on carbon first.…”
Section: Cross Section Ratio For Carbonmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The original measurement showed a large enhancement between XBj rv 0.1 (now known as the anti-shadowing region) and XBj rv 0.2, and a depletion at XBj > 0.6. The EMC collaboration performed subsequent experiments [14,20], published in 1988, to study the details of the structure function ratio at low xBj and low Q 2 . They measured the lepton-nucleus inclusive scattering cross section using a muon beam incident on C, Cu, Sn, and deuterium targets in the kinematic range 5 < Q 2 < 35 (GeV/c) 2 , 0.03 < zBj < 0.7.…”
Section: Emc Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35], and show that the effects of the non-S wave components for values of II: < 0.9 can be taken into account by using the effective proton and neutron polarizations generated by the S' and D wavefunctions, while nuclear binding and Fermi motion can be accounted for by the EMC effect [12]. The spin structure function of the 3He (g;) and its asymmetry (A3) can then be written as the incoherent sum of the neutron and proton spin structure functions where f p ( n ) (~, Q 2 ) is the fraction of events from the proton (neutron), and given by factor for a nucleus with A = 3.…”
Section: Experimental Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which have been measured most recently by NMC [33]. For an element with atomic number A and 2 protons, the cross section will be calculated by summing the cross sections for ( A -2) deuterons and ( 2 2 -A ) protons and then multiplying by the correction for the nuclear binding effects as determined by EMC [12] in an element of atomic number A , with For 3He, 2 = 2 and A = 3, so that the 3He component of the target will be modeled using 1 deuteron and 1 proton. The error in the model dilution factor that does not come from the radiative corrections has pieces that are z independent and pieces that are z dependent.…”
Section: Target Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect was first seen in 1983, when the EMC measured the ratio for muon scattering from iron and deuterium, expecting the ratio to be about 1 (with deviations at high x owing to Fermi smearing) [1,50]. The effect has been confirmed and repeatedly measured by many other groups, such as by a Rochester-SLAC-MIT collaboration [51,52], SLAC [4,49], BCDMS [53,54], the EMC [55,56], the NMC [57][58][59][60], HERA [61], and Jefferson Lab [62,63].…”
Section: The Emc Effectmentioning
confidence: 85%