2014
DOI: 10.22260/isarc2014/0137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Theoretical Relationships in Building Information Modelling Adoption in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This due to some of the advantages of PLS path modelling over conventional SEM with covariance analysis which include minimal assumptions regarding population or statistical distributions of data sets is required (Henseler and Sarstedt, 2013); minimum sample size as small as 30 is sufficient (Wixom and Watson, 2001) and more appropriate when dealing with real-world applications and complex models (Wu, 2010). Enegbuma et al (2014) assert that PLS path modelling is prevalent in strategic management research (Lauria and Duchessi, 2007), involving a systematic and sequential procedure in evaluating theoretical model (Rahman et al , 2013). It is more suitable for evaluating a model that is developed with limited theoretical knowledge (Lowry and Gaskin, 2014).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This due to some of the advantages of PLS path modelling over conventional SEM with covariance analysis which include minimal assumptions regarding population or statistical distributions of data sets is required (Henseler and Sarstedt, 2013); minimum sample size as small as 30 is sufficient (Wixom and Watson, 2001) and more appropriate when dealing with real-world applications and complex models (Wu, 2010). Enegbuma et al (2014) assert that PLS path modelling is prevalent in strategic management research (Lauria and Duchessi, 2007), involving a systematic and sequential procedure in evaluating theoretical model (Rahman et al , 2013). It is more suitable for evaluating a model that is developed with limited theoretical knowledge (Lowry and Gaskin, 2014).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a system that allows all engineering fields, such as architectural, civil and structure engineering, mechanical and electrical engineering, and quantity surveying to collaboratively work together on a project during construction project design planning until the building operation lifespan, inclusive of its demolition stage. However, every new tool has its challenges in its implementation, such as higher investment costs, legal issues, and contract issues that need to be resolved [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%