1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc.6690496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of urinary collagen cross-links indicate response to therapy in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 In a study of 36 breast carcinoma patients with bone metastases, both PYD and DPD excretion increased in those patients with progressive disease ( P < 0.03 at 8 weeks). 46 In contrast, levels of PYD and DPD did not appear to change significantly in responding patients. These bone resorption markers have demonstrated a good correlation with clinical outcome and appear to be much more sensitive to changes in bone metabolism compared with traditional bone markers.…”
Section: Bone Resorption Markersmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 In a study of 36 breast carcinoma patients with bone metastases, both PYD and DPD excretion increased in those patients with progressive disease ( P < 0.03 at 8 weeks). 46 In contrast, levels of PYD and DPD did not appear to change significantly in responding patients. These bone resorption markers have demonstrated a good correlation with clinical outcome and appear to be much more sensitive to changes in bone metabolism compared with traditional bone markers.…”
Section: Bone Resorption Markersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…22 These new markers include several unique breakdown products of Type I collagen, including the pyridinium crosslinks pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and the peptide‐bound crosslinks N‐ telopeptide (NTX) and C‐telopeptide (CTX). 22, 43–46 In comparison with calcium and hydroxyproline, these collagen breakdown products are more specific to bone and do not appear to be influenced by diet or metabolism. 25…”
Section: Bone Resorption Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers has reported that the sensitivity of markers of bone resorption was 50-80%. 6,10 Bombardieri et all. showed that sALP was not as valuable markers of disease activity as markers of bone degradation in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…alkaline phosphatase, are not as valuable markers of disease activity as markers of bone degradation such as urinary pyridinoline (uPYR) and urinary deoxypyridinoline (uDPD). 6 uPYR and uDPD is formed during the posttranslational phase of collagen synthesis and is corporated into the bone matrix as a component of collagen molecules. Whereas uPYR is widely distributed throughout the body tissues, uDPD is only found in collagen of bone and dentin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16], and the impact of various bisphosphonates on the inhibition of this process can be monitored by measuring several specific markers of bone resorption [22][23][24][25][26]. These specific markers include several unique breakdown products of type I collagen, including the pyridinium cross-links, pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline, and the peptide-bound cross-links, N-telopeptide and C-telopeptide [22][23][24][25][26]. The effects of bisphosphonates on bone resorption were initially thought to result primarily from the physicochemical effect on the structure of hydroxyapatite crystals, but their molecular and cellular effects on osteoclasts have gradually been elucidated.…”
Section: Bisphosphonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%