1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1011-1344(99)00113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of UV radiation using suspensions of microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inactivation rate constant K (square centimeters per millijoule) for the bacteria irradiated in the present studies varied from 0.065 for B. subtilis to 1.37 for Vibrio cholera (33). The rate constant for E. coli found in our studies varies from 0.63 to 0.52, which is also in very good agreement with the literature value of 0.54 (30,34). It might be interesting to note that the sensitivity to monochromatic and polychromatic UV radiation in the same narrow wavelength region and same dose was found to be very similar when applied with the same UV flux.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The inactivation rate constant K (square centimeters per millijoule) for the bacteria irradiated in the present studies varied from 0.065 for B. subtilis to 1.37 for Vibrio cholera (33). The rate constant for E. coli found in our studies varies from 0.63 to 0.52, which is also in very good agreement with the literature value of 0.54 (30,34). It might be interesting to note that the sensitivity to monochromatic and polychromatic UV radiation in the same narrow wavelength region and same dose was found to be very similar when applied with the same UV flux.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Biodosimetric measurements depend on the survival function of the microorganisms and on the shape of the fluence distribution in the UV reactor, as a wide distribution will result in reduction equivalent fluence (REF) measurements that depend on the microorganism tested (Sommer et al 1999). MS2 is typically used as a challenge organism due to its first order kinetics, while the tailing and even the shoulder complicates the physical explanation of the REF phenomenon.…”
Section: Tailing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large shoulders of repair proficient Escherichia coli strains exposed to near u.v. were because of the fluence‐dependent repair process, where repair decreases as fluence increases (Webb and Brown 1976), whereas repair deficient spores exhibit inactivation kinetics without shoulder (Tyrrell 1978; Munakata 1981; Sommer et al. 1999).…”
Section: Fluence‐based Inactivation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%