1980
DOI: 10.2307/3575293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of W Values of Low-Energy Electrons in Several Gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are identical to the case where a common tracking cut of 11 eV was used, and underline that a small change in the tracking cut does not influence the W‐value. For comparison, NOREC, PARTRAC, and RETRACKS simulations and experimental data in gaseous water are shown as well. While “option 2” and “option 6” values remain close down to about 20 eV, “option 4” predictions are the closest to NOREC and PARTRAC simulations; they are also closer to the experimental dataset in the gaseous phase, which represents an upper bound of values in the liquid phase .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are identical to the case where a common tracking cut of 11 eV was used, and underline that a small change in the tracking cut does not influence the W‐value. For comparison, NOREC, PARTRAC, and RETRACKS simulations and experimental data in gaseous water are shown as well. While “option 2” and “option 6” values remain close down to about 20 eV, “option 4” predictions are the closest to NOREC and PARTRAC simulations; they are also closer to the experimental dataset in the gaseous phase, which represents an upper bound of values in the liquid phase .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The same figure contains the data on the water ionization cost for the gaseous [51][52][53][54][55] as well as liquid phases [51,[56][57][58]. Our calculations have shown that the water molecule ionization cost for an electron energy of 1000 eV is W = 25.26 eV.…”
Section: Ionization Cost For Water Molecules In the Model With The Pamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Experimental results obtained in[54] (᭺) and[55] (᭝). (b) Calculated data for the liquid state of water: CSDA model [51] (4); MC model, NOREC code [56] (5); MC model, PARTRAC code [56] (6); MC model, RETRACKS code [57] (7), and MC model [58] (᭡).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was explained by the independence of the electron degradation spectrum, describing the energy spectrum of both primary and secondary electrons in matter under stationary conditions, on the initial particle energy. 5,6 For low energy particles, both F and W i depend on the initial projectile energy as was calculated 6-10 and measured 11 for electrons in various gases. Kowari et al 12 studied the influence of the Ar L and M shells on F and W i values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Combecher 11 reported on a smooth decrease of W i values in a large number of hydrocarbons with increasing electron energy from 5 to 500 eV. Suzuki and Saito, 18,19 using a gas proportional counter, observed sharp variations of W i around the C K edge in ethylene and propane, using x rays in a very limited energy range of 270-320 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%