1986
DOI: 10.1097/00005110-198604000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Technology Applications in Performance Appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inconsistency between the two assessments was also found by Battersby and Hemmings (1991), who found that manager and nurse rankings showed agreement on only half of their scale items. Our findings concerning slight positive correlation between the two assessments are corroborated by results obtained previously by Stalker et al. (1986) and Coates (1997), who also found positive correlation between manager and nurse assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inconsistency between the two assessments was also found by Battersby and Hemmings (1991), who found that manager and nurse rankings showed agreement on only half of their scale items. Our findings concerning slight positive correlation between the two assessments are corroborated by results obtained previously by Stalker et al. (1986) and Coates (1997), who also found positive correlation between manager and nurse assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies that have compared the assessments of nurse competence made by nurses and their managers have shown that the two assessments agree only to a certain extent. Stalker et al. (1986) compared performance appraisals of practising nurses and nurse managers.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cohen and Rhydderch 2006 On the contrary, Stalker et al (1986), were thorough in describing the process of changing and improving the nursing performance appraisal system. The project was conducted in 1981 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.…”
Section: Problems and Gaps Of Measuring Performance Of Medical Practimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step-by-step process aimed at reducing the length of the appraisal instrument and provide clarity to the items of performance evaluation through the use of quantitative data and computer programs to measure and evaluate the competencies and rating system. Although in the last twenty years, the performance measurement and management systems have developed significantly beyond the systems and processes that were applicable in the early 80's, Stalker et al (1986) were successful in describing the process and the specific competencies and performance indicators that are fundamental to the philosophy of nursing practice. They recommended continuous examination to some categories in the performance evaluation system of nurses to reflect realistic performance standards that can still be used to-date.…”
Section: Problems and Gaps Of Measuring Performance Of Medical Practimentioning
confidence: 99%