2010
DOI: 10.3137/ao1105.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of drifting and blowing snow at Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada during the star project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electric field strength fluctuated, reaching þ30 kV m À1 at a height of 4 cm above the snow surface and increasing towards the surface of the snowpack. More recent measurements were provided in February 2008 during an Arctic blizzard in Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada, by Gordon et al; [46] the measured electric field strength was 26.2 kV m À1 at a height of 0.5 m, which corresponded to model predictions given by the same authors. [47] According to Dunin, [39] when the electric field strength achieves the value 10 kV m À1 electric energy starts to dissipate through corona discharges that most likely occur on sharp edges where electric field gradients have maximum values.…”
Section: Triboelectrification Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The electric field strength fluctuated, reaching þ30 kV m À1 at a height of 4 cm above the snow surface and increasing towards the surface of the snowpack. More recent measurements were provided in February 2008 during an Arctic blizzard in Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada, by Gordon et al; [46] the measured electric field strength was 26.2 kV m À1 at a height of 0.5 m, which corresponded to model predictions given by the same authors. [47] According to Dunin, [39] when the electric field strength achieves the value 10 kV m À1 electric energy starts to dissipate through corona discharges that most likely occur on sharp edges where electric field gradients have maximum values.…”
Section: Triboelectrification Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…A 15% variation between the input section and the wind direction may lead to a 25% reduction in collector efficiency (Nickling and McKenna Neuman, 1997). For nets, the efficiency appears to depend on the sensor height above the ground (Font et al, 1998), the wind speed (Kobayashi, 1980), and the time that the sensor is exposed to the wind (Gordon et al, 2010). Indeed, snow particles may sublimate in the net, since nets are not protected from the wind or solar radiation.…”
Section: Measuring Aeolian Snow Transport: a Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most notable one is the orientation to the wind direction in association with a smaller device placed vertically such as the rocket trap (Budd, 1966;Dingle and Radok, 1961;Takahashi, 1985). On the other hand, nets do not require the air to be decelerated for the snow to be collected: the air enters the net in which snow particles are blocked and then freely passes through it (Gordon et al, 2010;Takeuchi, 1980). The key point is the mesh, which should be fine enough to collect very small particles and large enough to reduce its resistance to the wind.…”
Section: Measuring Aeolian Snow Transport: a Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, as we will show, the northeasterly high wind events are frequently accompanied by a hydraulic jump in the vicinity of Iqaluit, increasing the potential for significant turbulence and wind shifts which are of concern for aviation (Hudson et al, 2001). Furthermore, for wind speeds exceeding 30 kn, the likelihood of reduced visibility from blowing snow increases significantly (Gordon et al, 2010), thereby further increasing the impact of the strong wind events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%