2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of drug–protein binding by using immobilized human serum albumin liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
125
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When using this approach in qualitative studies, the sequence coverage of HSA has been reported to be 97.4%. 29 However, not all of the peptides detected in this technique have sufficient intensities to allow their use in quantitative proteomics and measurements of 18 O/ 16 O ratios. This additional requirement was found in this current study to lower the effective sequence coverage of HSA to 76.9%; however, this level of coverage was still sufficient for examining most of the possible immobilization sites on HSA.…”
Section: General Considerations In Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When using this approach in qualitative studies, the sequence coverage of HSA has been reported to be 97.4%. 29 However, not all of the peptides detected in this technique have sufficient intensities to allow their use in quantitative proteomics and measurements of 18 O/ 16 O ratios. This additional requirement was found in this current study to lower the effective sequence coverage of HSA to 76.9%; however, this level of coverage was still sufficient for examining most of the possible immobilization sites on HSA.…”
Section: General Considerations In Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducibility of the MALDI-TOF MS analysis was examined early in this work by using a mixture of 18 O and 16 O-labeled peptides from tryptic digests of soluble HSA. In one such study, a peptide MH + peak with a mass of 927.4939 had a relative standard deviation of !…”
Section: General Considerations In Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations