1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-806x(99)00276-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of photon-atom elastic scattering cross-sections in the photon energy range 1 keV to 4 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings suggesting the superiority of the RMFF theory have been reported earlier [16,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. It has been established both from comparison of theoretical results and from experiments that the RMFF, in general, produces better results than other choices of the FF [34].…”
Section: The Molecular Form Factorssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The findings suggesting the superiority of the RMFF theory have been reported earlier [16,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. It has been established both from comparison of theoretical results and from experiments that the RMFF, in general, produces better results than other choices of the FF [34].…”
Section: The Molecular Form Factorssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…At even higher energies, scattering from vacuum fluctuations in the atomic field (Delbrück scattering [37]) and nuclear scattering [3,15] become important. Comprehensive reviews on the topic of elastic x-ray scattering by atoms have been given by Kane et al [23] in 1986 and Bradley et al [5] in 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown by Bradley and Ghose (1986) that the differential Rayleigh scattering cross section values obtained by using the MRFF approximation are considerably smaller than the values obtained by applying the RFF and NFF approximations, and closer to the experimental data. It was mentioned (Bradley and Ghose, 1986;Bradley et al, 1999a;Kane, 2005;Kane et al,1983) that the RFF approximation is seen to be inadequate for an explanation of experimental data while the MRFF approximation is better than RFF approximation and in agreement with experimental data, and the NFF approximation is closer to the experimental data than RFF calculations. It has been a general experience that the order of validity of form-factor approximations is MRFF, followed by NFF, with RFF yielding the poorest predictions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%