2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Plasma-Free Metanephrines by Immunoassay Versus Urinary Metanephrines and Catecholamines by Liquid Chromatography with Amperometric Detection for the Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma

Abstract: Studies conflict concerning the use of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for plasma free metanephrines (P-MNs) vs. other methods for pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) diagnosis. We compared commercially available EIAs for P-MNs with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) for 24 h-urinary MNs (U-MNs) and -catecholamines (U-CATs). 943 (565 female, 378 male) patients (54 PPGL, 889 Non-PPGL) were studied. Simultaneous measurements of all parameters analyzed at the central lab of our university hospital was mandato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of plasma free metanephrines and urinary fractionated metanephrines are currently considered standard of care [8]. A recent study compared urine and plasma metanephrines by both HPLC and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods and found that all four methods are of similar diagnostic utilities, in fact plasma metanephrines by EIA actually had the highest posttest probability in this analysis [13 ▪ ]. In the pediatric population, particular attention must be paid to the logistics of obtaining plasma and urine samples.…”
Section: Biochemical Profilementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Measurements of plasma free metanephrines and urinary fractionated metanephrines are currently considered standard of care [8]. A recent study compared urine and plasma metanephrines by both HPLC and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods and found that all four methods are of similar diagnostic utilities, in fact plasma metanephrines by EIA actually had the highest posttest probability in this analysis [13 ▪ ]. In the pediatric population, particular attention must be paid to the logistics of obtaining plasma and urine samples.…”
Section: Biochemical Profilementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Currently, the most sensitive methods are chromatographic techniques, especially the technique of mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry). The sensitivity and specificity of this method in the determination of plasma free metanephrines is 94% and 100%, respectively [7]. In our work, we used the isotope method (RIA, radioimmunoassay) to determine plasma concentrations of metanephrine and normetanephrine.…”
Section: Original Papermentioning
confidence: 99%