2014
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/47/24/245602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of relative photoemission time delays in noble gas atoms

Abstract: We determine relative photoemission time delays between valence electrons in different noble gas atoms (Ar, Ne and He) in an energy range between 31 and 37 eV. The atoms are ionized by an attosecond pulse train synchronized with an infrared laser field and the delays are measured using an interferometric technique. We compare our results with calculations using the random phase approximation with exchange and multi-configurational Hartree-Fock. We also investigate the influence of the different ionization angu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the pulse duration of a typical few-cycle pulse is IR ≃ 5 fs (the period IR of an optical cycle for 800 nm radiation is IR = 2.7 fs), its oscillating field, controlled to within a small fraction of one radian, offers a convenient route to attosecond time resolution. The three different approaches utilized so far, linear momentum attosecond streaking with linearly polarized IR fields Drescher et al, 2001;Kienberger et al, 2004;Sansone et al, 2006;Cavalieri et al, 2007;Schultze et al, 2010;Sabbar et al, 2015), angular streaking ("attoclock"; Eckle et al, 2008a,b;Pfeiffer et al, 2011aPfeiffer et al, ,b, 2013 with circularly polarized IR fields, and the interferometric RABBIT technique (Paul et al, 2001;Toma and Muller, 2002;Mauritsson et al, 2005;Swoboda et al, 2010;Klünder et al, 2011;Guénot et al, 2012Guénot et al, , 2014Palatchi et al, 2014), have in common that the IR field probes the evolution during the emission, as implied by Eq. (2.18), without, however, necessarily performing a projective measurement which would lead to the "collapse of the wavepacket", i.e., to the reduction of the density operator.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the pulse duration of a typical few-cycle pulse is IR ≃ 5 fs (the period IR of an optical cycle for 800 nm radiation is IR = 2.7 fs), its oscillating field, controlled to within a small fraction of one radian, offers a convenient route to attosecond time resolution. The three different approaches utilized so far, linear momentum attosecond streaking with linearly polarized IR fields Drescher et al, 2001;Kienberger et al, 2004;Sansone et al, 2006;Cavalieri et al, 2007;Schultze et al, 2010;Sabbar et al, 2015), angular streaking ("attoclock"; Eckle et al, 2008a,b;Pfeiffer et al, 2011aPfeiffer et al, ,b, 2013 with circularly polarized IR fields, and the interferometric RABBIT technique (Paul et al, 2001;Toma and Muller, 2002;Mauritsson et al, 2005;Swoboda et al, 2010;Klünder et al, 2011;Guénot et al, 2012Guénot et al, , 2014Palatchi et al, 2014), have in common that the IR field probes the evolution during the emission, as implied by Eq. (2.18), without, however, necessarily performing a projective measurement which would lead to the "collapse of the wavepacket", i.e., to the reduction of the density operator.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the results as well as difficulties apply to alternative protocols as well. The latter include the interferometric RAB-BIT technique (Paul et al, 2001;Véniard et al, 1996;Toma and Muller, 2002;Klünder et al, 2011;Guénot et al, 2012Guénot et al, , 2014Palatchi et al, 2014) for ionization by attosecond pulse trains (APT) and angular attosecond streaking by circularly polarized IR pulses (Eckle et al, 2008a,b;Pfeiffer et al, 2011aPfeiffer et al, ,b, 2013.…”
Section: Attosecond Streaking Of Photoemission a Streaking Princmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(13), but the bulk of these effects can be added through the RPAE method, where certain sub-classes of many-body effects are included through the iterative solution of the equations for the p a coupled channels:…”
Section: A Treatment Of Many-body Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mean ionization time is faster than the coherence time of the photon pulse, the spectrum of the photoelectrons is broader than the original spectrum of the photons and it is dominated by the ionization emission spectrum. Most of the studies about the mean ionization time carried out so far refer to the outer shell electrons using photon energies of a few hundred electronvolts and report values from a few tens up to hundreds of attoseconds (as) (Dahlströ m et al, 2012(Dahlströ m et al, , 2015Kheifets, 2013;Gué not et al, 2014). A recent study of mean emission time of the inner shell electrons with photon energies of up to 10 keV has obtained delays of about 10 as (Kheifets et al, 2015).…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%