2012
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2012.2191656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Turbulence at Two Tidal Energy Sites in Puget Sound, WA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
183
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
19
183
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is assumed to be a consequence of the transition to the upper water column that is identified as a region of poor-quality data. This 10% turbulence intensity value is consistent with many sites studied in the literature concerning quantification of turbulence for ocean current and tidal power [21,22].…”
Section: Turbulence Intensity Metricsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is assumed to be a consequence of the transition to the upper water column that is identified as a region of poor-quality data. This 10% turbulence intensity value is consistent with many sites studied in the literature concerning quantification of turbulence for ocean current and tidal power [21,22].…”
Section: Turbulence Intensity Metricsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The range of turbulence conditions covers the expected turbulence intensities at tidal sites of approximately 10-15% [8], [9], although the length scales will likely be smaller due to the restrictions imposed by the flume size. However, it is not our intention to recreate the conditions at a specific tidal site, but to generate a range of turbulence intensities and length scales in which the turbine can operate to assess how they affect its performance and blade loads.…”
Section: Discussion and Summary Of Mapping Observationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Turbulence has been identified as requiring further investigation for both single devices [6] and arrays of multiple devices [7]. Tidal flows are highly turbulent with a broad range of length scales, and intensities [8], [9]. Previous investigations have shown how the thrust coefficient, or mean (time averaged) thrust force, of a porous disc rotor simulator can vary by over 20% in turbulent flows with different turbulence characteristics [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite tremendous effort to observe cavitation and turbulence in real environmental conditions, little has been successfully achieved that can easily be repeated. Today, the common way to measure underwater turbulence is by utilizing Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) (e.g., [24]) and Phased Array Doppler Sonar (PADS). However, not many studies of underwater turbulence and cavitation have been done using multibeam sonar (MBS) or dual-beam sonar (DBS) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%