Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386915-9.00020-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Dark Personalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
135
2
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
5
135
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, most Dark Triad research has used standard personality questionnaires whose validity has been well documented in the earlier personality literature. Newer, briefer measures are now available, although, to date, they have received less validation (Paulhus & Jones, forthcoming).…”
Section: Measurement Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, most Dark Triad research has used standard personality questionnaires whose validity has been well documented in the earlier personality literature. Newer, briefer measures are now available, although, to date, they have received less validation (Paulhus & Jones, forthcoming).…”
Section: Measurement Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jonason and colleagues have carried out a series of studies to support its validity (e.g., Jonason & Kavanagh, 2010). Although some researchers have found it to be useful (e.g., Rauthmann, 2012), others have been critical (e.g., Lee et al., forthcoming; Miller & Lynam, 2012; Paulhus & Jones, forthcoming; Rauthmann, forthcoming).…”
Section: Measurement Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirically, however, there is evidence that psychopathy also predicts online trolling. This state of affairs is partly due to empirical overlap between sadism and psychopathy, as assessed by the available measures (e.g., see Međedović & Petrović, 2015;Paulhus & Jones, 2015;Plouffe, Saklofske, & Smith, 2017). It is critical to theoretically and empirically distinguish these two constructs in future research.…”
Section: Recommendations For New Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological considerations of sadism emphasize both (a) pleasure derived from the suffering of others and (b) avoidance of guilt (e.g., Baumeister & Campbell, ). Broadly defined, individual differences in everyday sadism (Buckels, Jones, & Paulhus, ; Paulhus & Dutton, ) reflect tendencies to experience pleasure from the suffering of others that can be perpetrated directly (direct sadism) or observed from an outsider's perspective (vicarious sadism; Paulhus & Jones, ) and may involve physical, psychological, emotional, or even fantasized forms of harm. There are moderately sized positive associations between self‐report measures of sadism and the Dark Triad (Book et al, ; Buckels et al, ; Buckels, Trapnell, & Paulhus, ; Chabrol, Leeuwen, Rodgers, & Séjourné, ; March, Grieve, Marrington, & Jonason, ) that are similar in magnitude to the intercorrelations among those three traits (Paulhus & Williams, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%