Abstract:Manifest channel conflict is operationalized in terms of the frequency and intensity of disagreements between channel members and the importance of the issues about which they disagree. Six different multiple-item unidimensional measures including from one to all three of these components are evaluated with respect to reliability and validity with a sample of automobile dealers. The measure combining frequency, intensity, and importance multiplicatively is judged superior to the others.
“…In particular the measure of the items in the constructs of the two types of power (coercive and non-coercive) follows the approach of the work of Skinner et al (1992), one on cooperation is inspired by the work of Childers et al (1982) and the one on conflict follows Brown and Day (1981).…”
Section: The Research Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By themselves, they lead to an interdependence of the interactions. In the initial model it is the intermediate latent variables, which mediate the level of satisfaction (Stern and Reve 1980;Brown and Day 1981;Lusch and Brown 1982). The concepts of conflict and satisfaction in the distribution channels have been the focus of numerous researchers (Etgar 1979;Lusch 1976;Brown and Day 1981;Brown, Lusch and Muehling 1983;Dwyer 1980).…”
“…In particular the measure of the items in the constructs of the two types of power (coercive and non-coercive) follows the approach of the work of Skinner et al (1992), one on cooperation is inspired by the work of Childers et al (1982) and the one on conflict follows Brown and Day (1981).…”
Section: The Research Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By themselves, they lead to an interdependence of the interactions. In the initial model it is the intermediate latent variables, which mediate the level of satisfaction (Stern and Reve 1980;Brown and Day 1981;Lusch and Brown 1982). The concepts of conflict and satisfaction in the distribution channels have been the focus of numerous researchers (Etgar 1979;Lusch 1976;Brown and Day 1981;Brown, Lusch and Muehling 1983;Dwyer 1980).…”
“…These concepts are distinct but not necessarily opposed; both of them lead to the interdependence of exchanges. They are moderating latent variables to satisfaction (Stern and Reve 1983;Brown and Day 1981;Lusch and Brown 1982;Dant and Gijndlach 1998;Gassenheimer et al 1996).…”
Section: Conceptual Pls Model and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
“…Conflict in HQ-subsidiary relationships Conflict means different things to different people, and there is no consensus on the exact nature of this phenomenon (Pondy, 1967;Thomas, 1976;Brown and Day, 1981). For some, conjkt refers to any degree of disagreement between individuals and is part of all normal human behavior, while for others, the term is reserved to describe disagreements with severely negative consequences (see Schein, 1992).…”
Section: Business Network Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflict can be divided into a latent dimension and a manifest dimension and is often seen as a dynamic process progressing from the latent to the manifest state by means of perceived and felt conflict (see, for example, Brown and Day, 1981;Gaski, 1984;Pondy, 1967). In this article we focus on underlying latent conflicts in MNCs.…”
One of the advantages of the multinational corporation (MNC) is that it can exploit new product ideas globally in a rapid manner. This raises the issue of control of MNC new product introductions. It has been demonstrated that control over MNC subsidiaries differs depending on the strategic role assigned to the subsidiary. But, in addition to its role in the MNC, a subsidiary also has a role in a business network of relationships with important customers, suppliers, and other business partners. There is a latent conflict between these two roles. This article formulates and analyzes a structural model in which the dependencies associated with the two roles are related to conflict and control in subsidiary new product introduction. The model is supported empirically and demonstrates that control is a matter of handling the latent conflict between the two roles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.