2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring academic resilience in quantitative research: A systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
12

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
41
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies' results support the conclusion reached in our study. In addition, academic resilience has an empowering effect that leads to more highly developed coping skills both in one's normal and educational life (Kapıkıran, 2020; Kennedy & Bennett, 2006;Meneghel et al, 2019;Rudd et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies' results support the conclusion reached in our study. In addition, academic resilience has an empowering effect that leads to more highly developed coping skills both in one's normal and educational life (Kapıkıran, 2020; Kennedy & Bennett, 2006;Meneghel et al, 2019;Rudd et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides an overview in the analysis and measurement of the quantitative research design on the professional development system theory and skills for teachers. It focuses on the operation and process of the study, (Rudd, Meissel, & Meyer, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steinmayr and Spinath (2009) concluded that when predicting domain-specific achievement (e.g., mathematics performance), domain-specific motivational constructs are more useful predictors than general constructs. Furthermore, many of the non-domain-specific factors are challenging to measure and quantify, with some approaches involving use of psychometric scales with up to 30 items (Cassidy, 2016;Hirschi & Spurk, 2021;Rudd et al, 2021), which is not straightforward or practical to implement in a university setting. Therefore, the non-domain-specific group of factors are considered outside the scope of this study.…”
Section: Non-domain Specific Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%