2016
DOI: 10.1002/pds.3932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring adherence with medications: time is of the essence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians and researchers recognize that adherence changes over time. 27 Yet, this reality is often ignored in studies that measure adherence only once, or over a short interval. Even when measured longitudinally, data are often averaged over time.…”
Section: Myth 3: Adherence Is Staticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians and researchers recognize that adherence changes over time. 27 Yet, this reality is often ignored in studies that measure adherence only once, or over a short interval. Even when measured longitudinally, data are often averaged over time.…”
Section: Myth 3: Adherence Is Staticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence refers to the extent to which a patient takes medication as prescribed by a physician. Persistence is determined from continued prescription of a drug by the physician . A number of studies have indicated non‐adherence and non‐persistence with statin therapy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, through their method, time‐varying adherence to medication has been computed over a time period defined by three successive fills, time‐lapse different from the global time scale of the most studied clinical outcomes (e.g., time‐to‐event in survival analysis). Therefore, as Steiner (2016) highlighted, to establish a relationship between time‐varying adherence and clinical outcomes, it is fundamental that these two components are measured on the same time scale. In this way, it could be possible to investigate the effect of the longitudinal adherence on the clinical outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%