2017
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The myths of medication adherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(10) Unfortunately, inadequate research reporting often hampers interpretation of findings, complicates data abstraction for meta-analyses and prevents study replication. Common problems of reporting include unclear, inconsistent definitions; (11)(12)(13)(14) inadequate measurement of adherence outcomes; (7,14,15) suboptimal methods of analysis; (11)(12)(13)(14) insufficiently detailed descriptions of intervention delivery settings; (15) and scant theoretical underpinnings. (16) Previous efforts to improve adherence research reporting standards (11,(17)(18)(19)(20), adherence research, (17,19) include no clear conceptualization of medication adherence (11,17,19,20) and focus on research methods rather than reporting.…”
Section: Challenges and Shortcomings In Medication Adherence Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) Unfortunately, inadequate research reporting often hampers interpretation of findings, complicates data abstraction for meta-analyses and prevents study replication. Common problems of reporting include unclear, inconsistent definitions; (11)(12)(13)(14) inadequate measurement of adherence outcomes; (7,14,15) suboptimal methods of analysis; (11)(12)(13)(14) insufficiently detailed descriptions of intervention delivery settings; (15) and scant theoretical underpinnings. (16) Previous efforts to improve adherence research reporting standards (11,(17)(18)(19)(20), adherence research, (17,19) include no clear conceptualization of medication adherence (11,17,19,20) and focus on research methods rather than reporting.…”
Section: Challenges and Shortcomings In Medication Adherence Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies used pre-defined thresholds from prior research studies, while only five studies derived the adherence threshold from their studies' cohort percentiles or data distributions. Often, a threshold of 0.80 has been regarded as adequate adherence and has been applied in policy as a quality measure [61]. However, this threshold can differ by disease state [62], patient outcome of interest [63], and patient's health status [64], within the same study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are no formal recommendations for the definition of non-adherence, a threshold of <80% is often regarded as poor adherence [17]. However, higher MPR thresholds may be required, depending on the condition, medication, or patient populations [18,19]. For example, a threshold of 95% has been set for antiretroviral therapy due to its association with maximal viral load suppression and minimal opportunistic infection [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, insulin adjustments which may follow different diet plans, and involvement of caregivers were not accounted for in the present study. Since MPR measures only a single adherence behavior in the implementation phase of adherence time continuum [18], patientreported measures such as the Diabetes Self-Management Profile and diabetes self-care activities can be used concurrently with pharmacy refill records to provide holistic insights into non-adherent behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%