2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and localizing acoustic emission events in snow prior to fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, AE and MS appear to be an efficient way to monitor the progression of damage with a wide range of possible applications at different scales (Michlmayr et al, 2012), such as studies in mines detecting MS emissions in rock (Obert, 1977) or AE in laboratory rock fracture experiments (Lockner, 1993). Sensing and interpreting MS activity is one of the most promising approaches to monitoring failure development continuously in time over an entire slope or rock mass (Amitrano et al, 2005(Amitrano et al, , 2010Dixon et al, 2003;Got et al, 2010;Lévy et al, 2010;Spillmann et al, 2007), in a hanging glacier (Faillettaz et al, 2008(Faillettaz et al, , 2011 or in a steep snowpack (Reiweger et al, 2015;Van Herwijnen & Schweizer, 2011). The AE approach has been applied to landslide deformation characterization using a waveguide (Dixon et al, 2003Smith et al, 2017;Zoppè et al, 2015), to frozen rock in lab studies (e.g., Duca et al, 2014;Hallet et al, 1991;Mamot et al, 2018;Murton et al, 2016) and most recently at locale scales to mountain permafrost (e.g., Amitrano et al, 2012;Girard et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2012).…”
Section: Acoustic Emissions and Microseismic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, AE and MS appear to be an efficient way to monitor the progression of damage with a wide range of possible applications at different scales (Michlmayr et al, 2012), such as studies in mines detecting MS emissions in rock (Obert, 1977) or AE in laboratory rock fracture experiments (Lockner, 1993). Sensing and interpreting MS activity is one of the most promising approaches to monitoring failure development continuously in time over an entire slope or rock mass (Amitrano et al, 2005(Amitrano et al, , 2010Dixon et al, 2003;Got et al, 2010;Lévy et al, 2010;Spillmann et al, 2007), in a hanging glacier (Faillettaz et al, 2008(Faillettaz et al, , 2011 or in a steep snowpack (Reiweger et al, 2015;Van Herwijnen & Schweizer, 2011). The AE approach has been applied to landslide deformation characterization using a waveguide (Dixon et al, 2003Smith et al, 2017;Zoppè et al, 2015), to frozen rock in lab studies (e.g., Duca et al, 2014;Hallet et al, 1991;Mamot et al, 2018;Murton et al, 2016) and most recently at locale scales to mountain permafrost (e.g., Amitrano et al, 2012;Girard et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2012).…”
Section: Acoustic Emissions and Microseismic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snow slab avalanches are released as the result of crack formation and propagation in a buried weak snowpack layer. Laboratory fracture experiments with snow samples containing a weak snow layer confirmed that acoustic signals originate from within the weak layer (Reiweger et al, 2015). The failure of a weak snow layer resembles a progressive transition into a critical state (Johansen and Sornette, 2000) that is manifested by typical power-law statistics.…”
Section: Detection Of Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Six acoustic sensors located in the snow sample were recording concurrently the acoustic activity prior to the catastrophic failure, enabling thus the codetection method to be tested. We show here results for loading experiment on sample TRA 5 as such small sample experienced a clear catastrophic failure with a clear drop in b exponent prior to failure [ Reiweger et al , ].…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data of recorded acoustic emission (AE) activity during a force‐controlled loading of layered snow sample [ Reiweger et al , ]. (a) Global recorded acoustic emission (AE) counts from the six channels (experiment “TRA 5”); each event has been represented as a colored dot, and inset shows the separated trace of each channel for the same data.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation