2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring bank risk: Forward-looking z-score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature provides many variants of the Z‐score, of which the scores for banks' probability of default were conventionally computed based on ROA. Among these proxies of bank insolvency risk (e.g., ROE‐based, regulatory, returns‐based or forward‐looking and time‐varying Z ‐scores), the first ROE‐based ‘adjustment’ of the conventional Z ‐score enjoys increased popularity (Bouvatier et al, 2017; Hafeez et al, 2022; Lepetit & Strobel, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature provides many variants of the Z‐score, of which the scores for banks' probability of default were conventionally computed based on ROA. Among these proxies of bank insolvency risk (e.g., ROE‐based, regulatory, returns‐based or forward‐looking and time‐varying Z ‐scores), the first ROE‐based ‘adjustment’ of the conventional Z ‐score enjoys increased popularity (Bouvatier et al, 2017; Hafeez et al, 2022; Lepetit & Strobel, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars made the analysis to determine the connection between bank risk-taking and financing liquidity. When banks reduce their funding-liquidity risks, they raise their risk-weighted assets, enhance liquidity and decrease their Z-scores [16][17][18][19]. Furthermore, banks with lower financing liquidity risk were less risk-averse during the Global Financial Crisis.…”
Section: Objectives Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Laeven and Levine (2009) and Lepetit and Strobel (2013) recommended using a logarithm variant of the Z-score. In their study, Hafeez et al (2022) highlighted the fact that this measure is predominantly backward-looking. International Monetary Fund (2006), Huljak (2015), and Shaddady and Moore (2019) showed their discontent with the use of the Z-score as a potent indicator of bank stability.…”
Section: Measurement Of Bank Stability: a Relevant Review Of The Empi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, bank experts and regulators also dismiss this metric as an all‐encompassing indicator of bank stability. A further downside is that it is essentially a backward‐looking measure (Hafeez et al, 2022), and its value is sensitive to the yearly window length (3, 4, or 5 years) used to calculate the standard deviation of ROA. Lapteacru (2016) raised the issue of inconsistency of traditional accounting‐based Z‐score as an indicator of the probability of default or the banking system stability, particularly when the entire computation process of Z‐score and its variants is based on the unrealistic assumption that ROA is a random variable with a normal distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%