2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-007-9066-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Clinically Meaningful Change Following Mental Health Treatment

Abstract: Assessment of clinically meaningful change is useful for treatment planning, monitoring progress, and evaluating treatment response. Outcome studies often assess statistically significant change, which may not be clinically meaningful. Study objectives are to: (1) evaluate responsiveness of the BASIS-24 using three methods for determining clinically meaningful change: reliable change index (RCI), effect size (ES), and standard error of measurement (SEM); and (2) determine which method provides an estimate of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Alguns autores apontaram a importância dessa medida na avaliação dos resultados do tratamento 6,7 . Pesquisas recentes encontraram relações significativas entre a percepção de mudança pelos pacientes e as variáveis referentes à alteração na sintomatologia psiquiátrica 6,[13][14][15][16] , qualidade de vida 17 e percepção de mudança pelos familiares 18 . No entanto, a relação específica entre a percepção de mudança e a satisfação dos pacientes com os serviços tem sido pouco investigada 7 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Alguns autores apontaram a importância dessa medida na avaliação dos resultados do tratamento 6,7 . Pesquisas recentes encontraram relações significativas entre a percepção de mudança pelos pacientes e as variáveis referentes à alteração na sintomatologia psiquiátrica 6,[13][14][15][16] , qualidade de vida 17 e percepção de mudança pelos familiares 18 . No entanto, a relação específica entre a percepção de mudança e a satisfação dos pacientes com os serviços tem sido pouco investigada 7 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…(41) Based on Cohen, effect sizes of 0.2 are considered small, 0.5-0.6 are considered medium, and 0.8 are considered large. (42) …”
Section: Fatigue Pain and Spasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then categorized each participant according to whether their effect size calculation indicated a notable improvement (≥ .50) at Time 2 as proposed by Eisen, Ranganathan, Seal, and Spiro (2007 …”
Section: Analyses Strategy and Power Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%