2006
DOI: 10.1177/1098214006290356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Collaboration Among Grant Partners

Abstract: This section includes shorter papers (e.g., 10-15 double-spaced manuscript pages or less) describing methods and techniques that can improve evaluation practice. Method notes may include reports of new evaluation tools, products, and/or services that are useful for practicing evaluators. Alternatively, they may describe new uses of existing tools. Also appropriate for this section are user-friendly guidelines for the proper use of conventional tools and methods, particularly for those that are commonly misused… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
171
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
171
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature on inter-organizational collaboration, several collaboration maturity models have been suggested such as Community linkage model [19], Peterson model [37], integration model [11], the seven-stage model [9], and the organizational integration rubric [55] each encompassing a different number of collaboration levels and differentiating them with respect to different dimensions and/or in a different context (see [9] for a review). For the purpose of current study, we select Community linkage model [19] as the most relevant framework.…”
Section: Challenges Of the Existing Wbcts In Supporting The Ioc Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature on inter-organizational collaboration, several collaboration maturity models have been suggested such as Community linkage model [19], Peterson model [37], integration model [11], the seven-stage model [9], and the organizational integration rubric [55] each encompassing a different number of collaboration levels and differentiating them with respect to different dimensions and/or in a different context (see [9] for a review). For the purpose of current study, we select Community linkage model [19] as the most relevant framework.…”
Section: Challenges Of the Existing Wbcts In Supporting The Ioc Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para este trabajo hemos decidido tomar como base o mínimo común relacional los lazos más débiles que se pueden definir dentro de las relaciones interorganizativas, específicamente nos referimos a las relaciones de cooperación puntual, esto es, interacciones informales o formales con probable ausencia de objetivos y propósitos a largo plazo, y donde tanto la autoridad como los recursos son una prerrogativa y dominio de cada miembro de la interacción, y que asoman como base mínima y suficiente para evaluar las relaciones integradoras (Gajda, 2004;Frey et al, 2006). Además de su naturaleza integradora, estas relaciones de amplio espectro (cooperación puntual/lazos débiles), permiten incluir relaciones intragrupales, pero sobre todo, abrirse a considerar las intergrupales (generalmente entre nativos e inmigrantes); de igual forma, tampoco se excluyen las relaciones más densas o fuertes que pudieran desarrollarse entre los interactuantes, al contrario, una base relacional tan amplia nos permite acceder a una mayor variedad y número de interacciones entre las asociaciones y actores del entorno.…”
Section: Relaciones Y Redes Interorganizativasunclassified
“…(5) Collaboration is a process which suddenly emerges with the purpose of dealing with the increasing complexity in the organizational environment together with the other organizations. The give a definition, Inter-Organizations Collaboration is a relationship based on the foundations of responsibility, authorization and accountability which are shared with the purpose of acquiring mutual benefit aimed at common objectives between two or more organizations ( [87], reported Frey [31]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%