2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Conversion Efficiency of Solar Vapor Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
170
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All measurements were based on the standard procedure recommended elsewhere for SSG devices (Figures 5A and S25). 37 We observed obvious temperature increases in GMM film when exposing the SSG device under natural solar irradiation under AM 1.5G (one optical concentration, 1 C opt = 1 kW m À2 ). Localized high temperature of 47.5 C was observed on GMM while the bulk water was still kept at ambient temperature of 25 C ( Figure 5B), implying successful thermal concentration within the evaporation interface in GMM.…”
Section: Photothermal Conversion Performance Of Gmmmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…All measurements were based on the standard procedure recommended elsewhere for SSG devices (Figures 5A and S25). 37 We observed obvious temperature increases in GMM film when exposing the SSG device under natural solar irradiation under AM 1.5G (one optical concentration, 1 C opt = 1 kW m À2 ). Localized high temperature of 47.5 C was observed on GMM while the bulk water was still kept at ambient temperature of 25 C ( Figure 5B), implying successful thermal concentration within the evaporation interface in GMM.…”
Section: Photothermal Conversion Performance Of Gmmmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Note that the evaporation rate was calculated based on the projected area of the 3D evaporator. [ 25 ] The light‐to‐vapor energy conversion efficiency, which represented the ratio of incident light energy and the energy consumed for water evaporation, was calculated to be 130.4%. More importantly, the evaporation rate of the 3D spherical evaporator kept almost the same when the incident angle changed from 90° to 45°, whereas for the 2D counterpart, the evaporation rate significantly decreased from 1.10 to 0.81 kg m −2 h −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaporation rate of water can be greatly affected by various factors such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed. [ 51 ] Thus, the solar‐to‐steam conversion efficiency calculated by ηss=Δm×normalΔvapHmM×I×S×T=QevaQsolar=K×HeI×T [ 9,19 ] could be even larger than 100%, where K denotes the evaporation rate. Strictly speaking, K = K light − K dark , where K light and K dark represent the evaporation rates under light and dark conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%