2020
DOI: 10.1080/15502724.2020.1803082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Discomfort from Glare: Recommendations for Good Practice

Abstract: This article presents a review of the methods used for subjective evaluation of discomfort from glare, focusing on the two procedures most frequently used in past researchadjustment and category rating. Evidence is presented to demonstrate that some aspects of these procedures influence the evaluation, such as the range of glare source luminances available in an adjustment procedure, leading to biased evaluations and which hence reduce the reliability and validity of the data. The article offers recommendation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one participant was scheduled at a time. The formal experiment always started with a 5 min common “pre-lighting” stage (300 lx at 4000 K at eye level) for light adaption, which has been documented to have an influence on subjective evaluations given to lighting conditions that immediately follow [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. After the light adaptation phase, the light was changed either to the dim illuminance or the bright illuminance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one participant was scheduled at a time. The formal experiment always started with a 5 min common “pre-lighting” stage (300 lx at 4000 K at eye level) for light adaption, which has been documented to have an influence on subjective evaluations given to lighting conditions that immediately follow [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. After the light adaptation phase, the light was changed either to the dim illuminance or the bright illuminance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the subjective psychophysical approaches that have been common in discomfort glare research, advances in various physiological and other measurement techniques show promise for documenting the effect of glare sources on humans [32,33]. Fotios and Kent provide a summary of past studies that have measured discomfort using methods other than subjective psychophysical procedures [34]. Such methods include measuring changes in pupil size, electrograms using techniques such as electromyography (EMG), extent of eye opening, brain activity such as that measured through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), gaze behavior, and behavioral responses such as closing window blinds or changing seating positions and view direction.…”
Section: Test Procedures For Discomfort Glare Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these results showed that care is required when glare is evaluated using the category rating procedure. 7 Subjective evaluations can also be influenced by the range bias effect. 5 Range bias is a phenomena where the range of stimuli available influence the threshold values at which subjective evaluations occur -as stimuli maxima increase, the values at which subjective criteria such as visual discomfort are assessed also increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these results showed that care is required when glare is evaluated using the category rating procedure. 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%