2007
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring distances in proteins by saturation-recovery EPR

Abstract: We describe a protocol for detecting electron spin-spin interactions between a radical and a metal ion in a protein or protein complex by saturation-recovery electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). This protocol can be used with a protein containing an endogenous metal center and either an endogenous or synthetic radical species. We suggest a two-step approach whereby dipole-dipole or exchange interactions are first detected by continuous-wave EPR experiments and then quantified by saturation-recovery EPR. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that in the case of both exchange-coupled systems and in the presence of dipolar interactions, the relaxation factor b is usually found to be less than 1, as observed here for B. [24,25] From the microwave saturation results it is assumed that the uncoupled biradical component in B (with |J/a N | ϽϽ 1) should relax similarly to the PzNN monoradical, hence it saturates much faster than the dominant component under a strong exchange limit (|J/a N | ϾϾ 1). The comparison between the relaxation envelopes of B and PzNN at different microwave powers (see the Supporting Information) allows the subtraction from the observed ∆m s www.eurjoc.org= 1 resonance envelope of B a weighted percentage of uncoupled biradical (ca.…”
Section: Epr and Bulk Susceptibility Analyses Of Bmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that in the case of both exchange-coupled systems and in the presence of dipolar interactions, the relaxation factor b is usually found to be less than 1, as observed here for B. [24,25] From the microwave saturation results it is assumed that the uncoupled biradical component in B (with |J/a N | ϽϽ 1) should relax similarly to the PzNN monoradical, hence it saturates much faster than the dominant component under a strong exchange limit (|J/a N | ϾϾ 1). The comparison between the relaxation envelopes of B and PzNN at different microwave powers (see the Supporting Information) allows the subtraction from the observed ∆m s www.eurjoc.org= 1 resonance envelope of B a weighted percentage of uncoupled biradical (ca.…”
Section: Epr and Bulk Susceptibility Analyses Of Bmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…When dipolar and/or exchange interactions are present, the product (T 1 T 2 ) is no longer constant and b is found to be smaller than 1. [24,25] …”
Section: Epr Microwave Power Saturation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the microwave power used to record the EPR spectrum causes more spins to transition into the parallel than anti-parallel state, at low observe powers the equilibrium (Boltzmann) distribution of spins in the two states is main- Fig. 3. The interplay between the spin-lattice relaxation rate constant, k 1 , and the microwave observe power in the microwave progressive power saturation experiment.…”
Section: Epr: Microwave Progressive Power Saturationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[1][2][3] Sample preparation for saturation-recovery EPR may be easier than that for fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), [4] if either or both of the required ''labels", a paramagnetic metal center and a radical, are intrinsic species. If labeling with a radical is required for saturation-recovery EPR, a wide variety of nitroxide spin-labels are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter method has been used repeatedly with proteins (e.g., [336][337][338][339][340]). It will be fascinating to see what other methods will come up in the near and also more distant future to help to solve the "mysteries" of metal ion binding to nucleic acids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%