2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291703001624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient

Abstract: Background. Empathy plays a key role in social understanding, but its empirical measurement has proved difficult. The Empathy Quotient (EQ) is a self-report scale designed to do just that. This series of four studies examined the reliability and validity of the EQ and determined its factor structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

61
627
6
40

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 815 publications
(734 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
61
627
6
40
Order By: Relevance
“…For heterosexual males, mean scores and variance were almost identical to previous samples for both direct aggression (Buss & Perry, 1992;Bailey & Hurd, 2005) and empathy (Baron-Cohen et al, 2003;Lawrence et al, 2004) (see Table I). Social exclusion scores for heterosexual males were virtually identical to those of Forrest et al (in press), whereas malicious humour and guilt induction scores were approximately half a standard deviation lower in the current Internet based sample.…”
Section: 3) Comparison Of Online and Offline Samplessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For heterosexual males, mean scores and variance were almost identical to previous samples for both direct aggression (Buss & Perry, 1992;Bailey & Hurd, 2005) and empathy (Baron-Cohen et al, 2003;Lawrence et al, 2004) (see Table I). Social exclusion scores for heterosexual males were virtually identical to those of Forrest et al (in press), whereas malicious humour and guilt induction scores were approximately half a standard deviation lower in the current Internet based sample.…”
Section: 3) Comparison Of Online and Offline Samplessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This 60-item scale was developed to assess empathy, defined as the ability to identify mental states and respond with an appropriate emotional reaction (Baron-Cohen et al, 2003). While many previous empathy measures have been developed, they have frequently tapped into emotional arousability, self-confidence, sensitivity or non-conformity rather than empathy per se (Lawrence, Shaw, Baker, Baron-Cohen, & David, 2004). The EQ is both a reliable and valid measure of empathy (Lawrence et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Indirect Aggression Scale -Aggressor Version (Ias-a) Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…tasks requiring analysis of social situations (e.g. Carroll & Yung, 2006;Lawrence et al, 2004;Wakabayashi et al, 2007) Face Stimuli…”
Section: The Empathy Quotientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure recognition was not influenced by the ability to interpret facial expressions or specific mental states, this task consisted of newly-learned expressionless faces. Empathic processing was measured using the Empathy Quotient (EQ: Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004), a self-report questionnaire thought to be a particularly reliable indicator of empathy (Lawrence et al, 2004). We predicted that individuals who had higher levels of empathy would show superior face recognition ability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%