Measuring food preference and reward: Application and cross-cultural adaptation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in human experimental research

Oustric, Pauline; Torgerson, David; Dalton, Michelle; Beaulieu, Kristine; Gibbons, Catherine; Hopkins, Mark; Blundell, John; Finlayson, Graham

doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103824

Cited by 64 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, this study was conducted in young British adults with a relatively healthy BMI, which limits the generalization of the findings and of the specific foods validated for this methodology. Future studies outside of the UK should culturally adapt and validate food images for the diurnal assessment of food reward using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in their specific population [34].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The food images were presented individually in a randomized order and participants made their ratings using a 100-mm VAS. To calculate implicit wanting or explicit liking of fat appeal bias as a measure of hedonic preference for high-fat foods, low-fat food scores were subtracted from high-fat food scores, thus a positive score indicates greater implicit wanting/explicit liking for high-fat compared to low-fat foods [34].…”

Section: Test Meal Sessionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of Meal Timing and Chronotype on Food Reward and Appetite Control in Young Adults

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Early meal timing and chronotype are associated with lower BMI, but their impact on appetite is poorly understood. We examined the impact of meal timing and chronotype on appetite and food reward. Forty-four adults were divided into early (EC; Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) score = 55 ± 5) or late chronotype (LC; MEQ score = 40 ± 6) and assessed for body mass index, habitual energy intake (EI; three-day online dietary record) and eating behavior traits from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ). Participants attended the laboratory after ≥3 h fast on two occasions for early (AM; 8–10 a.m.) and late (PM; 4–6 p.m.) counterbalanced testing sessions in a 2 × 2 design. Appetite ratings and food reward (validated diurnal Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire) were measured in response to a standardized test meal. LC was associated with higher BMI (p = 0.01), but not with EI or TFEQ. The composite appetite score was lower in AM than PM (MΔ= −5 (95% CI −10, −0.2) mm, p = 0.040). Perceived test meal fillingness was higher in AM than PM and EC compared to LC (p ≤ 0.038). Liking and wanting high-fat food were lower in AM than PM (p ≤ 0.004). The late chronotype was associated with greater desire for high-fat food (p = 0.006). To conclude, early meal timing and early chronotype are independently associated with smaller appetite and lower desire for high-fat food.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Test Meal Sessionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Meal Timing and Chronotype on Food Reward and Appetite Control in Young Adults

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Consequently, even with the same methodology to assess food reward, the response to acute exercise seems to be equivocal and subject to individual variability. This could be explained by methodological issues; even though the same tool is used, the studies were conducted in different countries (UK, Saudi Arabia, Canada, France, and Norway) and the food images used may not have been cross-culturally validated [68]. The sample sizes were relatively small for most of the studies (ranging from 12 to 33), including mainly both genders and with different ranges of BMI.…”

Section: Acute Exercise Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Physical Activity on Food Reward: Review and Conceptual Synthesis of Evidence from Observational, Acute, and Chronic Exercise Training Studies

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review This review brings together current evidence from observational, acute, and chronic exercise training studies to inform public debate on the impact of physical activity and exercise on food reward. Recent Findings Low levels of physical activity are associated with higher liking and wanting for high-energy food. Acute bouts of exercise tend to reduce behavioral indices of reward for high-energy food in inactive individuals. A dissociation in liking (increase) and wanting (decrease) may occur during chronic exercise training associated with loss of body fat. Habitual moderateto-vigorous physical activity is associated with lower liking and wanting for high-fat food, and higher liking for low-fat food. Summary Food reward does not counteract the benefit of increasing physical activity levels for obesity management. Exercise training appears to be accompanied by positive changes in food preferences in line with an overall improvement in appetite control.

show abstract

“…Food Reward functions as an important conception for research within disciplines such as Health, Nutrition and Food Sciences [15]. For instance, several researchers within the Sensory and Consumer Science field seek to better understand Food Reward's role in appetite and hence our eating behaviors [16]. The most common Food Reward measures are self-reported liking [16,17], self-reported desire-to-eat [13] or wanting for a specific food [13,16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Ingestive Sensations Driving Post-Ingestive Food Pleasure: A Cross-Cultural Consumer Study Comparing Denmark and China

Duerlund

Andersen

Wang

et al. 2020

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Culture is one of the main factors that influence food assessment. This cross-cultural research aimed to compare Chinese and Danish consumers in their post-ingestive drivers of Post-Ingestive Food Pleasure (PIFP). We define PIFP as a “subjective conscious sensation of pleasure and joy experienced after eating”. We conducted two in-country consumer studies in Denmark (n = 48) and in China (n = 53), measuring post-ingestive sensations and PIFP using visual analogue scale, for three hours following consumption of a breakfast meal. Key results revealed perceived Satisfaction, Mental, Overall and Physical wellbeing to be highly influential on PIFP in both countries. Moreover, Danish consumers perceived appetite-related sensations such as Satiety, Hunger, Desire-to-eat and In-need-of-food to be influential on PIFP, which was not the case in China. In China, more vitality-related sensations such as Energized, Relaxation and Concentration were found to be drivers of PIFP. These results suggest similarities but also distinct subtleties in the cultural constructs of PIFP in Denmark and in China. Focusing on Food Pleasure as a post-ingestive measure provides valuable output, deeper insights into what drives Food Pleasure, and, importantly, takes us beyond the processes only active during the actual eating event.

show abstract

Measuring food preference and reward: Application and cross-cultural adaptation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in human experimental research

Abstract: This is a repository copy of Measuring food preference and reward: application and cross-cultural adaptation of the leeds food preference questionnaire in human experimental research.

Cited by 64 publications

References 43 publications

Impact of Meal Timing and Chronotype on Food Reward and Appetite Control in Young Adults

Impact of Meal Timing and Chronotype on Food Reward and Appetite Control in Young Adults

The Impact of Physical Activity on Food Reward: Review and Conceptual Synthesis of Evidence from Observational, Acute, and Chronic Exercise Training Studies

Post-Ingestive Sensations Driving Post-Ingestive Food Pleasure: A Cross-Cultural Consumer Study Comparing Denmark and China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About