Measuring global research activities using geographic data of scholarly article visits

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyse the geographical distribution of global research activities and to investigate the knowledge diffusion embodied in scientific papers. Design/methodology/approach The geographical summary of Frontiers articles displays the number of visits and categorizes where the visitors hail from. This study uses the records of 23,798 articles published in 16 Frontiers journals from 2007 to 2015 to analyse the geographical distribution of article visits at both country and city levels. The process of knowledge diffusion is investigated on the basis of the different visiting patterns of new and old papers. Findings Most article visits are concentrated around major metropolitan areas and some high-tech clusters. The top “visiting countries” include both developed countries and developing countries, and the USA and China are two major players. Publishing cities dominate article visits for new papers; as time passes, there is diffusion from the publishing cities to a broader area. Research limitations/implications The data on visiting for open access articles may be generated from various repositories besides the publishers’ websites; these data are ignored, as they are not significant enough to have much influence. There is also a lack of a basic theory in the data processing of outliers in the data set. In addition, only static results are given in this paper, as the data were collected on one day, for one time. A longer time period is necessary to track the dynamic diffusion process of the observations. Practical implications Introduction of usage data will propose a novel way to analyse research activities and track knowledge diffusion. Social implications The visiting data of articles offer a new way to investigate research activities at the city level in a detailed and timely manner, for the geographical distribution of research activities and the research resource allocation of a specific country to be explored. Originality/value This study measured the research activities of scientific papers by examining the usage data. Compared with previous studies that focused on the geographical distribution of scientific activities using publication data, citation data and even altmetrics data, usage data are at the forefront of this research. Therefore, usage data offer a fresh perspective on methodology, providing more detailed and real-time information.

Unveiling research productivity of premier IIMs of India (2010–2021)

“…The entire process of scientific and technological innovation involves ongoing research activity. Due to the lack of previously conducted research-related data, it is challenging to measure and track the research activities in a timely manner (Fang et al, 2017). A study by Barney et al (2022) on the research, balance and teaching levels of 324 management faculty members at public universities in the USA found that no one job resource accurately predicted the research output for all of the participants.…”

“…The entire process of scientific and technological innovation involves ongoing research activity. Due to the lack of previously conducted research-related data, it is challenging to measure and track the research activities in a timely manner (Fang et al. , 2017).…”

Designing Web-scale geographic search interface for libraries

“…The GIS using structures that show probable strategies to loyalty card data analysis and place loyalty card data in the hierarchy of an organization (Byrom et al , 2001). Fang et al (2017) evaluate how worldwide research operations and pursuits are transmitted in disseminating new knowledge in scientific publications. In addition to geographic search, the GIS interface improves community-level services among society’s users.…”

Article-Level Metrics

“… 18 These metrics can be monitored over time to visualize temporal and geographic trends of article usage. 19 20 Variations in use of HTML, PDF, and XML article formats can be also reported to guide publishers over the readership preferences and priorities for reuse, archiving, and marketing. 19 …”