2006
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults: Swedish normative data for the SF-36 and the HADS, and the influence of age, gender, and method of administration

Abstract: Background: There is a paucity of research about health-related quality of life (HRQL) among adolescents, as studies have to a large extent focused on adults. The main aim was to provide information for future studies in this growing field by presenting normative data for the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for Swedish adolescents and young adults. Additionally, the influence of age and gender, as well as method of administration, was investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
151
11
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
19
151
11
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-stroke fatigue was defined as FSS score C5 [21]. Post-stroke depression was defined as HADSD C11 [11]. FSS was chosen because it has been validated in stroke patients [22].…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-stroke fatigue was defined as FSS score C5 [21]. Post-stroke depression was defined as HADSD C11 [11]. FSS was chosen because it has been validated in stroke patients [22].…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poststroke fatigue was defined as FSS score ≥5 [18,19]. Poststroke depression was defined as HADS-D ≥8 [20]. Poststroke pain was defined as VAS score >0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems imperative to somewhat change the curriculum for the nurse and physician education to include education in assessing patients' needs and coping resources and possibly also in methods aiming at meeting these needs. The strengths of the present study are the use of matched pairs, the short time period between adolescent and staff ratings, selection of a situation that was equal for all participants, i.e., a short time after diagnosis, and the procedure to collect data via telephone which possibly resulted in a higher response rate than self-administered questionnaires would have [25]. Adolescent self-reports are regarded as the gold standard against which staff ratings were compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%