2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring ipsilateral silent period: Effects of muscle contraction levels and quantification methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the iSP is complicated involving alpha motor neuronal dynamics, callosal transfer with multiple inhibitory internetworks (including spinal), and muscular control, determination of the exact mechanism driving the change is not possible in the current work. However, it is likely that cortical changes account for more of the change than changes in the periphery (muscle capacity/tone), as previous work has repeatedly shown that increased levels of exogenous stimulation alters silent period duration more so than increased motor load (Giovannelli et al, 2009 ; Kuo et al, 2017 ). Therefore, the silent period may be a reflection of an intrinsic cortical inhibitory framework that serves to regulate interhemispheric transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the iSP is complicated involving alpha motor neuronal dynamics, callosal transfer with multiple inhibitory internetworks (including spinal), and muscular control, determination of the exact mechanism driving the change is not possible in the current work. However, it is likely that cortical changes account for more of the change than changes in the periphery (muscle capacity/tone), as previous work has repeatedly shown that increased levels of exogenous stimulation alters silent period duration more so than increased motor load (Giovannelli et al, 2009 ; Kuo et al, 2017 ). Therefore, the silent period may be a reflection of an intrinsic cortical inhibitory framework that serves to regulate interhemispheric transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iSP is a complicated measurement that involves a number of cortical and descending spinal inhibitory connections. The silent period onset is typically ~38 ms after stimulation and can last anywhere from 10 to 70 ms depending on stimulation and level of muscle contraction (Giovannelli et al, 2009 ; Petitjean and Ko, 2013 ; Fleming and Newham, 2017 ; Kuo et al, 2017 ). The ipsilateral inhibition seen in the most commonly measured muscle, the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), certainly involves primary motor cortex (M1) callosal transfer, as degradation of the corpus callosum diminishes the measure (Meyer et al, 1995 ; Li et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ipsilateral silent period and related EMG activity were recorded from the FDI of the left hand, following the delivery of 15 TMS pulses (150% RMT) to the ipsilateral hemisphere ( 111 ). Approximately 3 s before each pulse, participants were instructed to perform 100% of MVC of their left hand, by applying force with their index finger to the force transducer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rMT was determined as the lowest TMS intensity required to elicit a 50 μV motor evoked potential at least 50% of the time (5 out of 10 trials) at each hotspot. IHI was quantified as the normalized ipsilateral silent period of APB and TA muscle activity following a TMS pulse (Kuo et al, 2017). Participants were instructed to activate each muscle to 50% of their maximal voluntary contraction as a TMS pulse was delivered to the ipsilateral hemisphere (intensity: 130% rMT for APB and 110% rMT for TA).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%