Measuring maintenance activity effectiveness

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for measuring the imprecise and subjective “effectiveness” of a major maintenance activity. Such a measure will not only bring objectivity in gauging the effectiveness of maintenance task carried out by the workforce without any intervention from an expert but also help in measuring the slow degradation of the performance of the concerned major equipment/system. Design/methodology/approach The paper follows a three-step approach. First, identify a set of parameters considered important for estimating the maintenance activity effectiveness. Second, generate a set of data using expert opinions on a fuzzy performance measure of maintenance activity effectiveness (output). Also, find an aggregated estimate of the effectiveness by analysing the consensus among experts. This requires using a part of the “fuzzy multiple attribute decision making” process. Finally, train a neuro-fuzzy inference system based on input parameters and generated output data. Findings The paper analysed major maintenance activity carried out on diesel engines of a power plant company. Expert opinions were used in selection of key parameters and generation of output (effectiveness measure). The result of a trained adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) matched acceptably well with that aggregated through the expert opinions. Research limitations/implications In view of unavailability of data, the method relies on training a neuro-fuzzy system on data generated through expert opinion. The data as such are vague and imprecise leading to lack of consensus between experts. This can lead to some amount of error in the output generated through ANFIS. Originality/value The originality of the paper lies in presentation of a method to estimate the effectiveness of a maintenance activity.

A Suggested Approach for Maintenance Performance Framework: An Aircraft Maintenance Organization as a case study

“…MPIs offered in former literatures vary from one researcher to another, but can be gathered into several categories. Parida [28] comprised seven criterions for system performance evaluation like cost, customer satisfaction, equipment, training, maintenance task, health and safety, and employee satisfaction. On the other hand, Rana and Koroitamana.…”

A Consensus Measure of Expert Judgment in the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

“…In turn, Alcantud et al [35] designed a procedure to predict patient survival in lung cancer resections from soft set and fuzzy set theory perspectives. Other interesting examples of the use of MCGDM and methods that use expert opinions and fuzzy sets can be found in the literature [36][37][38].…”

Maintenance strategy selection: a combined goal programming approach and BWM-TOPSIS for paper production industry

“…Furthermore, Rana and Emosi (2018) measured the effectiveness of maintenance activities, aiming to present a framework for measuring the undesirable and subjective “practical” impacts of major maintenance activity. Such measurement not only leads to the adaptability of the effectiveness of maintenance by the workforce without any intervention by a specialist but also helps to measure the slow performance deterioration of the existing system within the main one.…”