EditorialOpen Access Cardiovascular Pharmacology: Open Access C a rd iovascu la r P h ar macol o g y : O pe n Acc es s
ISSN: 2329-6607The recently reported ANTARCTIC trial [1] is an open-label, blinded endpoint-adjudication, randomised controlled superiority study from 35 centres in France testing the role of tailored antiplatelet therapy among 877 elderly patients (41% women and 28% diabetics) over the age of 75 years (~20% over 85) with either ST elevation or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary stenting.Patients (recruited between March 2012 and May 2015) were started on prasugrel 5 mg daily and randomized to tailored antiplatelet therapy (n=435) versus conventional therapy (n=442). Platelet function was assessed by the point-of-care VerifyNow P2Y 12 cartridge platelet function test performed on days 14 and 28. If platelet reactivity unit (PRU) was ≥208, prasugrel was increased to 10 mg daily; and if ≤85, prasugrel was changed to clopidogrel 75 mg daily.The trial excluded patients with previous history of transient ischaemic attack or stroke, fibrinolytic therapy within the past 48 h, chronic oral anticoagulation, concomitant medical illness with reduced survival, allergy or intolerance to aspirin or thienopyridines, active bleeding or history of bleeding diathesis, thrombocytopenia, severe hepatic impairment, or conditions potentially associated with poor treatment adherence such as dementia.It turned out that in the tailored antiplatelet therapy group only 3.7% required escalation to prasugrel 10 mg daily while 39.3% were converted to clopidogrel 75 mg daily. The primary outcome, measuring the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization, or bleeding complication at 1 year, occurred in 27.6% of the tailored therapy group vs. 27.8% of the conventional therapy group (p=0.98). Secondary outcome measuring the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or urgent revascularization was also not different, 9.9% vs. 9.3% respectively (p=0.80).The ANTARCTIC authors concluded that platelet function monitoring with treatment adjustment did not improve clinical outcomes. They further remarked in their concluding paragraph of the abstract that "…..platelet function testing is being used in many centres and international guidelines still recommend platelet function testing in high-risk situations. Our study does not support this practice or these recommendations."Where Do We Stand with Anti-Platelet Therapy PostCoronary Stenting?The basis for dual antiplatelet agents (aspirin plus a P2Y 12 receptor antagonist) in preventing acute and sub-acute thrombosis after coronary stenting was established 2 decades ago. The era of drug eluting stents from the last decade onwards ushered the practice of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in the hope of preventing late stent thrombosis. With this approach comes the conundrum between antithrombotic benefit versus bleeding risk, hence the quest for a potential "sw...