2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.105018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring QED cross sections via entanglement

Abstract: We consider a QED scattering (AB → AB), in which B is initially entangled with a third particle (C) that does not participate directly in the scattering. The effect of the scattering over C's final state is evaluated and we note coherence (off-diagonal) terms are created, which lead to non null values for σx and σy that are, in principle, measurable in a Stern-Gerlach apparatus. We chose a particular QED scattering (e + e − → µ + µ − ) and found that σx and σy are proportional to the total cross section (σ tot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x,z = 0, contrarily to the conclusion in [50]. This result is guaranteed for any other combination of d j , since any other entanglement of two particles implies the same behavior in the individual systems B and C as seen in |Ψ ± (Φ ± ) ; a combination in which all the d j are different from 0 would lead to a product state in which C could clearly be isolated from the scattering process between A and B.…”
Section: Final Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x,z = 0, contrarily to the conclusion in [50]. This result is guaranteed for any other combination of d j , since any other entanglement of two particles implies the same behavior in the individual systems B and C as seen in |Ψ ± (Φ ± ) ; a combination in which all the d j are different from 0 would lead to a product state in which C could clearly be isolated from the scattering process between A and B.…”
Section: Final Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Finally, some of us has studied the QED inelastic process e + e − → µ + µ − watched by an spectator particle, entangled with one of the particles in the in-state [50]. It was claimed that partial information about the dynamics and the total cross-section of particles A, B could be obtained from spin measurements on the spectator particle C. In the present contribution we provide a complete analysis by considering a general tripartite spin 1/2-state…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…give identical results for transition probabilities. However, it has recently been pointed out [11]- [17] that the two approaches have subtle differences with how quantum information is distributed in a scattering process [18]- [28].…”
Section: Jhep07(2020)228mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They give identical results for transition probabilities. However, it has recently been pointed out [11]- [17] that the two approaches have subtle differences with how quantum information is distributed in a scattering process [18]- [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%