2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2006.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring semantic similarity between Gene Ontology terms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
163
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
163
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, the semantic similarity between protein pairs is calculated by the Lin method (GraSM) to weigh the PPI networks (Couto et al, 2007). We develop the WCOACH (Weighted COACH) method based on the COACH algorithm and predict protein complexes in weighted PPI networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the semantic similarity between protein pairs is calculated by the Lin method (GraSM) to weigh the PPI networks (Couto et al, 2007). We develop the WCOACH (Weighted COACH) method based on the COACH algorithm and predict protein complexes in weighted PPI networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the health domain, the researchers are mainly concerned with seeking similar health science terms. In the field of bioinformatics, the focus is on measuring the similarity between concepts from the gene ontology [16][17][18][19]. In the field of web services, the researches concentrate on semantic service discovery [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that most people agree on the relative semantic relatedness of most pairs of concepts [2,3]. Therefore, many technologies have been developed to date in order to precisely measure the extent of similarity relatedness and similarity between concepts in multiple disciplines, such as information retrieval (IR) [4][5][6][7][8][9], natural language processing (NLP) [10][11][12][13], linguistics [14], health informatics [15], bioinformatics [1,[16][17][18][19], web services [20], ontology extraction/matching [21][22][23] and other fields. In the fields of IR and NLP, the researches primarily focus on word sense disambiguation [9,10], multimodal document retrieval [24], text segmentation [7,12] and query preciseness enhancement [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ambiguous vocabulary of the data leads to difficulties in querying metadata systems to search for information. Incorrect outcomes could be obtained either by returning too general terms or too deep terms according to the search criteria (Shatkay and Feldman, 2003;Pérez et al, 2004;Couto et al, 2007). However, a well designed semantic structure can enhance the metadata system by providing better precision in the search process.…”
Section: Ontology-based Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%