2014
DOI: 10.1177/1362361314542955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring social communication behaviors as a treatment endpoint in individuals with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: Social communication impairments are a core deficit in autism spectrum disorder. Social communication deficit is also an early indicator of autism spectrum disorder and a factor in long-term outcomes. Thus, this symptom domain represents a critical treatment target. Identifying reliable and valid outcome measures for social communication across a range of treatment approaches is essential. Autism Speaks engaged a panel of experts to evaluate the readiness of available measures of social communication for use a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
157
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time that the study was designed, there was a lack of validated measures of the core problems of social affect and communication experienced by children with ASD that were sensitive to change. 35,36 The ADOS was originally developed as a diagnostic tool to assess whether or not children have impairments and unusual behaviours that would indicate ASD. Although some previous studies have used the ADOS to assess the clinical effectiveness of interventions, 22,37,38 concerns have been raised about the suitability of the ADOS to assess changes in the adaptive functioning of children with ASD.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time that the study was designed, there was a lack of validated measures of the core problems of social affect and communication experienced by children with ASD that were sensitive to change. 35,36 The ADOS was originally developed as a diagnostic tool to assess whether or not children have impairments and unusual behaviours that would indicate ASD. Although some previous studies have used the ADOS to assess the clinical effectiveness of interventions, 22,37,38 concerns have been raised about the suitability of the ADOS to assess changes in the adaptive functioning of children with ASD.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these tools are designed to measure change in response to treatment in ASD. Both CGI and ABC are documented to be sensitive to change (Anagnostou et al, 2015). Review of the outcome measures is documented in Table 3: Summary of Study Measures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of widely used validated outcome measures were used, including the CGI (Guy, 1976), the Social Responsiveness Scale (Constantino, 2002), the ADOS (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; Lord et al, 2000), as well as several cognitive measures. The Social Responsiveness Scale and the ADOS are not tools designed to measure treatment response in ASD and their ability to detect change remains unclear (Anagnostou et al, 2015). Treatment and control groups were receiving ABA therapy during the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other areas, such as ASD or rare phenocopy syndromes, where there are fewer treatment studies with significant findings (or none), it is more difficult to identify a narrow set of outcome measures that will reliably detect change in symptoms. In such cases, the field must start by identifying consensus measures, which are likely to be imperfect, while waiting for more data to emerge (Anagnostou et al, 2014 (in press); Scahill et al, 2013). Studies that choose a less commonly used primary outcome measure should still include 1-2 standard measures to allow cross-measure comparison.…”
Section: Measurement Challenges: Differentiating Treatment Effects Frmentioning
confidence: 99%