2019
DOI: 10.1111/emip.12300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Textbook Content Coverage: Efficient Content Analysis with Lesson Sampling

Abstract: This study addresses measurement issues around a standards-based content analysis of mathematics textbooks' coverage of standards for use in large-scale monitoring of standards implementation as proposed in a 2013 report by the National Research Council. An earlier study produced an exhaustive content analysis of textbooks using the 2012 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. This yielded an accurate and reliable portrait of a textbook's coverage of standards. However, such an in-depth analysis is not fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metaphors obtained from the forms filled out by the participants were analyzed using the "content analysis" method. As Zhang et al ( 2020 ) stated, the basic process in content analysis is to gather similar data within the framework of certain concepts and themes to interpret them by organizing. Within the scope of the study, metaphors containing similar elements, which were produced by teachers for the relevant questions, were organized under certain categories and interpreted for the reasons created by the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The metaphors obtained from the forms filled out by the participants were analyzed using the "content analysis" method. As Zhang et al ( 2020 ) stated, the basic process in content analysis is to gather similar data within the framework of certain concepts and themes to interpret them by organizing. Within the scope of the study, metaphors containing similar elements, which were produced by teachers for the relevant questions, were organized under certain categories and interpreted for the reasons created by the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive and negative metaphors were divided into categories involving their reasons. Zhang et al ( 2020 ) stated that informing the individuals accurately about the study in a detailed way and not changing the answers given to the questions in the qualitative research increase the validity of the study. In this context, in order to increase the validity of the study, the studies carried out in the process have been explained in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of time and content dimensions, there was a significant rise from ten days to twenty days, after which the increase plateaued. This study also drew inspiration from sampling methodologies in mathematics textbook content analysis (Zhang et al, 2020), in which two types of sampling schemes were explored: random sampling similar to Kurz et al (2014) and systematic sampling. Within systematic designs, teachers are subjected to stratified sampling based on weekly, monthly, or quarterly strata.…”
Section: Within-teacher Sampling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within systematic designs, teachers are subjected to stratified sampling based on weekly, monthly, or quarterly strata. As per Zhang et al (2020), sampling 1 day per week and coding the respective lessons provided adequately accurate depictions of a textbook's overall content.…”
Section: Within-teacher Sampling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are less innovative in developing student worksheets (Leasa et al, 2016) so that analytical content related to science textbooks is needed to develop better science textbooks. Many have conducted a content analysis on science textbooks, such as textbook content analysis on the topic of scientific literacy (Ardianto & Pursitasari, 2017) (Zakiya et al, 2017), textbook content analysis on high order thinking skills (HOTS) (Pratama & Retnawati, 2018), content analysis on textbook related to nutrition (Grommet & Tkachenko, 2019), teacher's book content analysis (Güven, 2010), mathematics textbook content analysis (Vicente et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020), physics textbook analysis (Bancong & Song, 2018), content analysis on assignments in elementary science textbooks (Andersen, 2020), and many more. However, the content analysis of primary school science textbooks in Indonesia related to the low-carbon topic of the prior studies has not been analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%