2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Impact of Lotteries on State per Pupil Expenditures for Education: Assessing the National Evidence

Abstract: State-operated lotteries have recently been asserted by public administrators and academicians as panaceas for eradicating revenue disparities existing across public school districts in the American states. The purpose of this research project is to empirically test the hypothesis that lottery revenues raise the state expenditures for public education. A state-level national dataset, which includes fifty American states over the period 1977-1997, was used for the analysis. Pooled time-series cross-sectional an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its usefulness had also been recognized in special education studies (Horner et al, 2005;Marston, 1988), in measuring teaching effectiveness (Lin & Lawrenz, 1999), and self-regulated learning (Schmitz & Wiese, 2006). Time-series is preferred in longitudinal inquiries such as in the assessment of the effectiveness of school reforms (Bloom, 2003;May & Supovitz, 2006), the effect of financial aid to educational quality (Henry & Rubenstein, 2002) and the impact of lotteries to state expenditure for education (Moon, Stanley, & Shin, 2006). Ortega and Iberri-Shea (2005) posit that time-series ''constitutes the single best formal strategy for investigating effects of instruction longitudinally'' (p. 33) in their meta-analysis of approaches used for second-language acquisition.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Refutation Of Misconceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its usefulness had also been recognized in special education studies (Horner et al, 2005;Marston, 1988), in measuring teaching effectiveness (Lin & Lawrenz, 1999), and self-regulated learning (Schmitz & Wiese, 2006). Time-series is preferred in longitudinal inquiries such as in the assessment of the effectiveness of school reforms (Bloom, 2003;May & Supovitz, 2006), the effect of financial aid to educational quality (Henry & Rubenstein, 2002) and the impact of lotteries to state expenditure for education (Moon, Stanley, & Shin, 2006). Ortega and Iberri-Shea (2005) posit that time-series ''constitutes the single best formal strategy for investigating effects of instruction longitudinally'' (p. 33) in their meta-analysis of approaches used for second-language acquisition.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Refutation Of Misconceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if time series are long enough and if the required assumptions hold, then interrupted time series designs are among the strongest quasi-experimental designs. Nonetheless, time series designs in educational evaluations are rare and typically not long (Henry & Rubenstein, 2002;Kearney & Kim, 1990;Lin & Lawrenz, 1999;May & Supovitz, 2006;Moon, Stanley, & Shin, 2005).…”
Section: Interrupted Time Series Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%