2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1063773718120058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Probabilistic Photometric Redshifts of X-ray Quasars Based on the Quantile Regression of Ensembles of Decision Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that we could improve our result, if, in addition to good photometry for the entire sample, we could increase the training sample of bright objects by the time when eROSITA survey will be available. Photo-z computed via ML for X-ray selected sources in 3XMM-DR6 and 3XMM-DR7 where recently presented also in Ruiz et al (2018) and Meshcheryakov et al (2018), respectively. While we are in overall agreement with the first, our results are less optimistic than those obtained by the second group.…”
Section: X-ray Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It means that we could improve our result, if, in addition to good photometry for the entire sample, we could increase the training sample of bright objects by the time when eROSITA survey will be available. Photo-z computed via ML for X-ray selected sources in 3XMM-DR6 and 3XMM-DR7 where recently presented also in Ruiz et al (2018) and Meshcheryakov et al (2018), respectively. While we are in overall agreement with the first, our results are less optimistic than those obtained by the second group.…”
Section: X-ray Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes ML a natural choice for the computation of photo-z for the very large forthcoming deep and wide surveys such as Euclid (Laureijs 2010) and LSST (Ivezić et al 2019), in which the computation of photo-z will be a real challenge. For AGN, the next challenge is presented by the ∼ 3 million sources that eROSITA (extended Roentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array; Merloni et al 2012), the primary instrument on the Russian Spektrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) mission, will detect. eROSITA will provide an all-sky X-ray survey every 6 months for 4 years, with a final expected depth of 1 × 10 −14 erg/cm 2 /s (3 × 10 −15 erg/cm 2 /s at the poles) which is about 30 times deeper than ROSAT (Voges et al 1999;Boller et al 2016) in the soft band (0.5-2 keV).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• supervised feed-forward neural networks (Collister and Lahav, 2004;Vanzella et al, 2004;Brescia et al, 2013Brescia et al, , 2014Brescia et al, , 2015Brescia et al, , 2019Cavuoti et al, 2014;Almosallam et al, 2016;Sadeh et al, 2016); • self-adaptive methods for the detection and removal of anomalies from photometric and spectroscopic data (Hoyle et al, 2015;Baron and Poznanski, 2017;Reis et al, 2019); • Support Vector Machines (Zheng and Zhang, 2012;Zhang and Zhao, 2014;Han et al, 2016;Jones and Singal, 2017); • tree-based (Carrasco Kind and Brunner, 2013;Jouvel et al, 2017;Meshcheryakov et al, 2018); • k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) (Graham et al, 2018;Curran, 2020); • Gaussian processes (Bonfield et al, 2010;Almosallam et al, 2016); • Mixture Density Networks (Ansari et al, 2020); • unsupervised models for clustering and for estimating the coverage of the parameter space (Way and Klose, 2012;Masters et al, 2015;Stensbo-Smidt et al, 2017) or for calibration purposes (Hildebrandt et al, 2010;Masters et al, 2015;Wright et al, 2020); • deep Neural Networks, especially relevant for the photo-z prediction from images Chong and Yang, 2019;Pasquet et al, 2019); • hybrid methods for the selection of photometric redshifts considered particularly accurate and useful for cosmological purposes (Bonnett et al, 2016;Leistedt and Hogg, 2017;…”
Section: General Aspects Of the Photo-z Estimation With MLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting list of optical candidates was processed by the SRGz system, which operates over the entire Eastern Galactic hemisphere region of the eROSITA X-ray survey and automatically analyzes photometry and positions of optical objects in the Xray sources vicinity. SRGz use tree-based machine learning algorithms (Gradient Boosting and Random Forest, see Meshcheryakov et al, 2018), which are trained on samples of quasars, galaxies, and stars from the SDSS spectroscopic catalog, sample of distant z > 5 quasars (Ross & Cross, 2020) and sample of GAIA DR2 stars associated with 3XMM DR8 sources. For more details on the principles of operation of SRGz and the algorithms implemented in it see Meshcheryakov (2021).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%