2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2380-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are input redundancy and output deficiency in both the G20 developed and developing countries. From the perspective of input indicators redundancy, R&D personnel redundancy occurred frequently (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) in Japan and the Russian Federation, while R&D expenditure redundancy occurred frequently (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) in Canada, France, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. The output deficiency mainly focuses on the scientific and technological output, while the economic performance performs well.…”
Section: Input Redundancy and Output Deficiency Of Astimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are input redundancy and output deficiency in both the G20 developed and developing countries. From the perspective of input indicators redundancy, R&D personnel redundancy occurred frequently (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) in Japan and the Russian Federation, while R&D expenditure redundancy occurred frequently (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) in Canada, France, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. The output deficiency mainly focuses on the scientific and technological output, while the economic performance performs well.…”
Section: Input Redundancy and Output Deficiency Of Astimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation efficiency, which is "the ability to translate inputs into innovation outputs" by definition, has become very important and attractive to scholars and governments [7,8]. Because of the unique advantages in the efficiency evaluation of multi-input and multioutput [9], the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely used to measure the relative efficiency of Decision-Making Units (DMUs) by estimating the ratio of outputs to inputs [10][11][12]. Many studies investigated innovation efficiency at the national [13][14][15], regional [10,16,17], and institutional levels [18][19][20] by means of DEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some interesting methods for quantitative measurement of innovation performance are presented in surveys of Fritsch and Slavtchev (2011), Hudec and Prochádzková (2013), Zuo and Guan (2017). In another interesting approach, Zemtsov and Kotsemir (2019) showed that DEA could be a widespread tool for surveying the region's innovative results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the weaknesses of the DEA is that it may give several efficient organizations with an efficiency value of 1 after performing the evaluation, so it is almost impossible to separate the efficiency of these organizations with this method (Hou et al, 2018). Moreover, because the interrelationship among DMUs is neglected, DEA has a major lack of ability to distinguish between those DMUs at all (Zuo & Guan, 2017). In another word, if the number of indicators is high compared to the number of DMUs, the evaluation operation will face a problem and the model will present an efficiency value of 1 for most organizations mistakenly (Geng et al, 2018), therefore, the DMUs number must be minimally twice higher than the total indicators number, i.e., sum of inputs and outputs (Nourani et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%