2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(01)00292-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the size of the coincidence set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The following theorem is a version for manifolds of the main result in [8] Proof. Since n > (|G| − r)m ≥ m, f * (V k ) = 0, for all k ≥ 1.…”
Section: Let Us Consider the Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The following theorem is a version for manifolds of the main result in [8] Proof. Since n > (|G| − r)m ≥ m, f * (V k ) = 0, for all k ≥ 1.…”
Section: Let Us Consider the Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We note that similar methods can be used to estimate sizes of "(H, G)-coincidence sets" (see [11] for a definition), as exhibited in [16].…”
Section: Proof (1) It Is Clear That Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonçalves, Jaworowski and Pergher [3] have defined (H, G)-concidence for a continuous map f from a n-sphere S n into a k-dimensional CW-complex Y , where G is a finite group which acts freely on S n and have proved that if H is a nontrivial normal cyclic subgroup of a prime order, then…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%