2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the stellar wind parameters in IGR J17544-2619 and Vela X-1 constrains the accretion physics in supergiant fast X-ray transient and classical supergiant X-ray binaries

Abstract: Context. Classical supergiant X-ray binaries (SGXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) are two types of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) that present similar donors but, at the same time, show very different behavior in the X-rays. The reason for this dichotomy of wind-fed HMXBs is still a matter of debate. Among the several explanations that have been proposed, some of them invoke specific stellar wind properties of the donor stars. Only dedicated empiric analysis of the donors' stellar wind can pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
96
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
14
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms previous findings that most of the outbursts displayed by IGR J17544-2619 occur when the neutron star is closer to the supergiant companion and that the orbit of this system could be characterized by a non-negligible eccentricity (see, e.g., Drave et al 2014;Romano 2015, and references therein). Although this eccentricity could help in enhancing the X-ray dynamic range achievable by IGR J17544-2619, it cannot be the only explanation for the extreme behavior displayed by this source, as the system orbital period is relatively short and only a limited eccentricity of 0.2-0.3 can be expected (Walter et al 2015;Giménez-García et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This confirms previous findings that most of the outbursts displayed by IGR J17544-2619 occur when the neutron star is closer to the supergiant companion and that the orbit of this system could be characterized by a non-negligible eccentricity (see, e.g., Drave et al 2014;Romano 2015, and references therein). Although this eccentricity could help in enhancing the X-ray dynamic range achievable by IGR J17544-2619, it cannot be the only explanation for the extreme behavior displayed by this source, as the system orbital period is relatively short and only a limited eccentricity of 0.2-0.3 can be expected (Walter et al 2015;Giménez-García et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, precise measurements of the wind properties are still scarce due to the large distances of the SFXTs that make observations challenging, especially in the ultraviolet domain. Furthermore, through the performed observational cam-paigns so far, it was not possible to identify a net difference in the stellar wind properties of SFXTs and classical SgXBs, and thus the tentative discrimination between the proposed theoretical scenarios in the two classes of sources still relies upon the largely unknown values of the neutron star pulsation periods and magnetic field strength (see discussions in Bozzo et al 2016;Giménez-García et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We adopt a mass of 1.8M with an uncertainty about 20%. Then one get Racc ≈ 10 lt-s for v rel ∼ 400 km s −1 (Giménez-García et al 2016). We looked for the time delay between the Fe Kα line and the continuum (3-6 keV) with the cross-correlation function for light curves in Seg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In order to test the viability of Equation (5), we use it to compare against the orbital period (P orb =8.95 days) of the wellstudied wind-fed HMXB Vela X-1 (Hiltner et al 1972;Lamers et al 1976;Quaintrell et al 2003). We adopt the Vela X-1 supergiant stellar wind velocity, mass, and mass-loss rate provided by Giménez-García et al (2016) and the X-ray luminosity derived by Sako et al (1999):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%