2009
DOI: 10.1080/16507541.2010.481900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the success of Finnish family farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in light of the other key objectives of CAP 2021-2027 inspired by the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability, and the role of recreational activities in sustainability promotion, and good agricultural practices encouragement, with a positive impact on farms, households and rural territory development (Tew and Barbieri 2012;Mastronardi et al 2015;Flanigan et al 2015), it is particularly important that policy-makers promote a shift of perspective of farmers perhaps too focused on subjective success factors (Mäkinen et al 2009) towards a new agritourism business model that aims to increase firm's profitability-that is in line with "with economic and non-economic benefits for society and the local community" (Broccardo et al 2017, p. 2). This represents a viable option for overcoming the lags of farm income behind the rest of the economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in light of the other key objectives of CAP 2021-2027 inspired by the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability, and the role of recreational activities in sustainability promotion, and good agricultural practices encouragement, with a positive impact on farms, households and rural territory development (Tew and Barbieri 2012;Mastronardi et al 2015;Flanigan et al 2015), it is particularly important that policy-makers promote a shift of perspective of farmers perhaps too focused on subjective success factors (Mäkinen et al 2009) towards a new agritourism business model that aims to increase firm's profitability-that is in line with "with economic and non-economic benefits for society and the local community" (Broccardo et al 2017, p. 2). This represents a viable option for overcoming the lags of farm income behind the rest of the economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we must recognize that the use of subjective performance measures may lead to findings that differ from those based on objective performance measures. In many studies, subjective and objective measures of farm performance have been often treated as equivalent although they are often not correlated (Jackson‐Smith et al., 2004; Mäkinen et al., 2009). One explanation is that farmers are not very familiar with economic indicators typically used in business analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation is that farmers are not very familiar with economic indicators typically used in business analysis. They rate their own financial success based on the liquidity available in their bank account for private consumption and to pay the bills (Mäkinen et al., 2009). Subjective ratings therefore reflect a broader view of farm performance than objective measures focused on more specific financial indicators capturing the production side of agriculture at the enterprise level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problem is that in the agricultural sector due to the low mobility of productive resources, and the low reproduction capability of production factors, the right of the marginal revenue equalization of production factors works to a limited extent. That is why the weaker entities, due to the lack of alternatives in terms of market activity, may continue to operate in the market at the low efficiency of production factors applied and the depreciation of assets (Makinen et al 2009). In addition, there are environmental limitations when it comes to increase the efficiency of the primary production factor, which is the land.…”
Section: The Implications Of the Complexity Issue In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%