2011
DOI: 10.3233/fi-2011-392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Analysis of Finite Idempotent Relations

Abstract: Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noticed that, with the definition above, the definition of countEs needed to be different, since we do not want to count duplicates, and therefore was based on a card o set operation, rather than on a combination of listsum and of size, as in Listing 1.1. The problem coming from duplicates is typical of formal enumerations and counting algorithms [12]. Therefore, a second attempt was tried: whereby a remdups operation was simply added at the end of each recursion to remove duplicate entries.…”
Section: Performance and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should also be noticed that, with the definition above, the definition of countEs needed to be different, since we do not want to count duplicates, and therefore was based on a card o set operation, rather than on a combination of listsum and of size, as in Listing 1.1. The problem coming from duplicates is typical of formal enumerations and counting algorithms [12]. Therefore, a second attempt was tried: whereby a remdups operation was simply added at the end of each recursion to remove duplicate entries.…”
Section: Performance and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore submitted it to the OEIS; it passed the review process and is now published at http://oeis.org/A284276. Although there is existing work on the verified enumeration and counting of mathematical objects [11,7,12], this is the first mechanically certified addition to the OEIS we are aware of. Another immediate consequence upon looking at the obtained sequence is that even the counting problem is likely to be as hard as that of counting posets, given the fact that no advanced result permitting to detach the numbering of event structures from that of posets is known, and given the fast growth of the sequence, testified by the last column of table 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%