“…Indeed, whilst cardiovascular imaging enables accurate representation of the 3D anatomy, current techniques do not allow acquisition of the patient-specific in vivo mechanical characteristics. Response to device deployment depends not only on the material properties of the implantation site itself, but also on the presence of surrounding structures ( Kim et al, 2013 ), thus limiting in some contexts the value of ex-vivo data from arterial tissue ( Avril et al, 2010 , Badel et al, 2011 , Cabrera et al, 2013 , Flamini et al, 2015 , García-Herrera et al, 2013 , Li et al, 2008 , Ning et al, 2010 , O’Dea and Nolan, 2012 , Veljković et al, 2014 ). In addition, non-invasive, inverse computational methods, based on simultaneous acquisition of pressure gradients and diameters, ( De Heer et al, 2012 , Hamdan et al, 2012 , Karatolios et al, 2013 , Masson et al, 2008 , Schlicht et al, 2013 , Schulze-Bauer and Holzapfel, 2003 , Smoljkić et al, 2015 , Wittek et al, 2013 , Zeinali-Davarani et al, 2011 ), are limited to describe the patient-specific behaviour during the cardiac cycle, but not at overload due to device expansion ( Bosi et al, 2015 , Bosi et al, 2016a , Bosi et al, 2016b ).…”