2018
DOI: 10.2478/cerce-2018-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Damage to Corn Seeds

Abstract: The objective of this research was to evaluate and model the mechanical damage to corn seeds under impact loading. The experiments were conducted at moisture contents of 7.60 to 25% (wet basis) and at the impact energies of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 J, using an impact damage assessment device. The results showed that impact energy, moisture content, and the interaction effects of these two variables significantly influenced the percentage of physical damage in corn seeds (p<0.01). Increasing the impact of the energy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this term, using the number of damage seeds as an index, OPV seeds were approximately 3 times more resistant to mechanical damage than the hybrid seeds. This is an indication that the genetic identity of the seed lots plays a significant role in determining the mechanical quality of the seed lots (Shahbazi and Shahbazi, 2018). Size of seeds used in this study did not influence the degree of seeds damage partly because grading was excluded from the processing activities (Ajayi et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Pattern Of Electrolyte Leakagementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this term, using the number of damage seeds as an index, OPV seeds were approximately 3 times more resistant to mechanical damage than the hybrid seeds. This is an indication that the genetic identity of the seed lots plays a significant role in determining the mechanical quality of the seed lots (Shahbazi and Shahbazi, 2018). Size of seeds used in this study did not influence the degree of seeds damage partly because grading was excluded from the processing activities (Ajayi et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Pattern Of Electrolyte Leakagementioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is because mechanization facilitates timeliness in seed production and minimizes production cost (Ajayi et al, 2006). The impact of damage does not only depend on processing operations, but also on velocity of impact, seed structural features, seed variety, seed type, seed moisture content, stage of ripeness, fertilization level and unsuitable equipment adjustment (Shahbazi and Shahbazi, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction Introduction Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical damage to seeds due to impact does not only depend on the processing operation but also depends on the impact velocity [ 1 ], seed structural characteristics [ 2 , 3 ], seed variety [ 4 ], seed type [ 5 ], seed moisture [ 1 , 6 ], ripening stage, level of fertilization [ 7 , 8 ] and improper setting of the equipment [ 9 ]. Symptoms of mechanical damage to seeds may be in different forms [ 2 , 3 , 10 ]. External damage to seeds is easily visible, such as breakage and cracking of the seed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moisture content of corn has a significant impact on the rate of broken grain (BGR) and the rate of uncleared grain (UGR) of direct grain harvesting [18,19]. BGR and UGR are the smallest when the grain moisture content is in the range of 15-25% [20].…”
Section: Characteristic Of High Moisture Content Cornmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with the ANOVA analysis results in Tables 5 and 6, the effect order of factors like the rotational speed of the cylinder, the clearance of the concave and the cylinder, and feed amount was consistent, just the degree of action was different. Considering the operation parameters of the threshing cylinder should be of as low rates of broken grain and uncleared grain as possible in Equation (18), the numerical optimization of the combination of parameters was a rotational speed of the threshing cylinder of 309.17 r/min, a concave clearance of 35.48 mm, and a feed amount of 6.13 kg/s. The BGR and UGR were 1.65% and 0.96%, respectively; this result still meets the requirement of the corn harvest standard.…”
Section: Verification Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%