2013
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Evaluation of an Implant-Abutment Self-Locking Taper Connection: Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Tests

Abstract: This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…© C I C E d i z i o n i I n t e r n a z i o n a l i prosthesis (6,17,23). The notation that stands out, however, is how the D dental implant characterized by the presence of the micro-threaded neck has a significantly different behaviour if compared with the other model (15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…© C I C E d i z i o n i I n t e r n a z i o n a l i prosthesis (6,17,23). The notation that stands out, however, is how the D dental implant characterized by the presence of the micro-threaded neck has a significantly different behaviour if compared with the other model (15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with this, the locking-taper connection was introduced. It is defined as a tapered connection with an angle connection <1.5 degrees on both components [24]. Major advantages of the locking-taper connection include increased mechanical stability with no micromovements or microgaps at the IAI, thus leading to fewer rates of biological and prosthetic complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different restorative solutions, implants have been successfully used to support single-tooth restorations (crowns), fixed partial dentures (bridgeworks), full arch fixed or removable dentures and restore function and aesthetics in fully and partially edentulous patients [9][10][11][12]. Worldwide statistics show that a high success rate of dental implants (over 95 %) occurs if implants are properly designed and manufactured [13], and if they are inserted in a bone segment characterized by good quality and quantity [14,15]. Nevertheless, success of the prosthetic treatment is widely affected by a number of factors that can change the biomechanical coupling between implant and bone, such as implant location, mechanical and morphological properties of bone, mechanical and geometrical features of implant as well as the prosthesis, and type and magnitude of the load transferred by the implant to the bone, as well as by host factors such as smoking and bacterial environment [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Implant-prosthesis Connection Micro-displacementsmentioning
confidence: 99%