2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties and failure of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, studied using a microindentation device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multilayered biomass composed of glycoproteins, water, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides chains acts as viscoelastic material which can support considerable elastic deformation under shear stresses and is able to distribute loads, thereby decreasing the contact pressure at the surface [12,13,[73][74][75]. Also, that viscoelastic biomass can be responsible for the friction on oral surfaces [12].…”
Section: Presence Of Oral Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multilayered biomass composed of glycoproteins, water, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides chains acts as viscoelastic material which can support considerable elastic deformation under shear stresses and is able to distribute loads, thereby decreasing the contact pressure at the surface [12,13,[73][74][75]. Also, that viscoelastic biomass can be responsible for the friction on oral surfaces [12].…”
Section: Presence Of Oral Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest modelling approaches for biofilms make use of empirical elastic or shear moduli to express a linear relationship between scalar stress and strain measures as in earlier studies [13][14][15][16][17]. The viscoelastic response has classically been interpreted in terms of linear spring-dashpot analogies such as the standard linear solid, the generalized Maxwell or Burgers model [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Expressing the relaxation function in terms of a Prony series, Towler et al [25] used the latter model within a commercial finite element program to perform two-dimensional simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms of various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains subjected to physical deformations in fluid were shown to be viscoelastic fluids, which behave like elastic solids over periods of a few seconds but like linear viscous fluids over longer times. Therefore in several studies, bacterial biofilms have been reported to behave as viscoelastic materials [38,122,123], while in other studies they are described as elastic [124,125]. Chemical perturbations can reduce biofilm viscoelasticity and hence slow down recovery to their original state [126].…”
Section: Biofilms Contribute To Viscoelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength and apparent viscoelastic modulus of P. aeruginosa biofilms grown on membrane filters has also been investigated using a uniaxial compression experimental device and a film rheometer [118]. Directly applied and controlled loading forces have been used to quantify various biofilm viscoelasticity parameters, usually without a hydrodynamic flow, for example microbead FS [120], the micro-cantilever technique [130,131], indenters [122] or T-shaped probes [75], which are used to pull (tensile testing under a normal load) or push (compression testing under a normal load) the biofilm (see review 38 and references therein). On the other hand, there are several methods that use hydrodynamic loading, where biofilms are subjected to a fluid flow in flow cells [109,112,132], or Couette-Taylor type reactors [133,134].…”
Section: Biofilms Contribute To Viscoelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%