“…However, no group of samples was able to excel at all tested aspects at once, indicating that parameters and strategies must be selected based on the objectives of the final results. In a broad sense, the following can be stated: continuous pattern strategies seem to generate less denser parts, this is mainly due to the incorporation of defects such as lack of fusion/pores, associated with this strategy [66]; all samples weighted below the theoretical weight, mainly due to the inclusion of pores by a lack of fusion; chessboard and stripes 67° pattern strategies seem to promote the best overall results, as the samples produced by these strategies are always among the best three in the tested categories; residual stress is higher on vertical faces than horizontal faces; the use of chessboard strategies along with build support structures generated the lowest residual stress values; Ra surface roughness ranges between 8-12 µ m, being equivalent to certain machined surfaces (originating from sawing, drilling, milling and turning processes), casted surfaces and forged surfaces; build orientation does not influence surface hardness; Takata, et al [79], Fiocchi, Tuissi, Bassani and Biffi [42] and Lv, et al [80] are examples of authors that have researched into the heat treatability of AlSi10Mg alloys, having observed that heat treatments in the 300 • C temperature range, or higher, lead to Si particle segregation from the supersaturated matrix in uniformly distributed manner throughout the α-Al matrix, as seen in Figure 6b, in the form a granular small particles. Also, a fading of layer and melt pool tracks begins to occur, generating a more uniform structure and mechanical properties.…”