Mechanical properties of hard–soft block copolymers calculated from coarse‐grained molecular dynamics models

Abstract

To relate the mechanical responses of hard–soft copolymer systems with their microstructures, a coarse‐grained molecular dynamics approach is employed, and mechanical properties of both hard and soft domains are calculated. We first investigate the enhancement mechanism of hard domains under tensile and shear loading conditions with pressure. The energy factor that denotes the interaction between hard beads dominates the microphase separation and morphology. Our numerical experiments show that pressure is the most crucial factor in shear‐under‐pressure tests, with larger pressure leading to higher shearing resistance of the copolymers. The viscoelastic behaviors of hard–soft copolymers are computed from the stress autocorrelation function. The stress relaxation indicates that the soft matrix is in a rubbery state at room temperature while hard domains are “glass‐like” and can be viewed as elastic solids in a macroscale model. In addition, local elastic constants of hard domains are computed using the stress–strain fluctuation method with purely local stress and local strain. Those results can be used as inputs for macroscale models for copolymers and can provide guidelines for designing polymeric materials. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2018, 56, 1552–1566

Structural and Mechanical Properties of Ionic Di-block Copolymers via a Molecular Dynamics Approach

“…An increase in the mechanical behaviors has been found with increasing A-block volume and A-A block interaction. Zhang et al discovered that pressure serves as the most crucial factor in determining the shear-under-pressure behaviors of hard-soft copolymer systems [18]. To quickly achieve the microphase segregation, soft-core potentials are often adopted in numerical simulations to first obtain ordered phase.…”

A polyurethane-urea elastomer at low to extreme strain rates

“…• The material parameters associated with viscoplastic flow in the h 1 mechanism was identified using the shear yield stress τ (h 1 ) vs. shear strain rate γp(h 1 ) plot. From the thermallyactivated viscoplastic flow model in Equation (11), the equation can be rewritten as…”

“…Also, the high strain rate responses (> 10 3 s −1 ) have been widely studied in the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) setup and the Taylor-type gas-gun apparatus [7,8]. In conjunction with experimental studies, there have been many theoretical and computational modeling efforts that aim at exploring the large strain mechanical behavior and the phase behavior of the hard and soft components in the polyurethane and polyurea materials at molecular- [9][10][11] and continuum scales [12][13][14][15].…”

Molecular dynamics study of the linear viscoelastic shear and bulk relaxation moduli of poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO)

“…To obtain the full viscoelastic response of polymers by computational means, equilibrium MD and Monte Carlo simulations are used to determine the stress auto-correlation function (SACF). The SACF, when combined with the Green-Kubo relationship, allows us to calculate the viscoelastic behavior of the melt [36][37][38] . To probe polymer response across multiple time and length scales, various particle-based models from simple bead-spring 39,40 to coarse-grained (CG) 38,41 , to united-atom (UA) 42 to highly complex allatoms (AA) 43 models have been developed with varying efficiency and accuracy.…”